Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+PRR\-UP\s+power\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+PRR\-UP\s+power\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lsallee@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 15:55:01 -0600; Tom, You and Fred may have provided just the clues I was looking for. Doing a search for GI68, I found this in the archives. If I read it right, the GI68 came out of North Platte on the UP, then Q fr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00042.html (13,007 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Frederick Ripley <fjr68@live.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 15:45:59 -0500; Larry and All, On the PRR, AC-2 (also sometimes an AC-4) were indeed connections for CB&Q traffic, and AST-4 handled a good bit of reefer traffic, much of which no doubt came from the UP/CB&Q. Glad t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00044.html (14,533 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lsallee@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 17:55:01 -0600; The westbound counterpart was GI-67. I found a wealth of scheduling info here. I'm pretty sure the train in the photo is eastbound at Stone Avenue. Larry -- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, Frederick Ripley <; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00051.html (14,422 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Tom Lynch <thje@nntc.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 23:33:27 -0500; Tom, You and Fred may have provided just the clues I was looking for. Doing a search for GI68, I found this in the archives. If I read it right, the GI68 came out of North Platte on the UP, then Q f; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00055.html (15,164 bytes)
5. [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:17:37 -0500; Re: PRR-UP power "Tom Lynch" thomaslynch5840 Sat Aug 4, 2012 9:33 pm (PDT) . Posted by: Tom, I doubt that the U.P. power was delivered in Chicago during the Q era. At the time, the state of Illinois; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00057.html (14,448 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Mike <havremt2002@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 11:49:17 -0700 (PDT); That is correct, GI 68 was an eastbound from UP - Grand Island. It seems to me that UP took delivery of New SD locomotives, some of them cabless in Chicago and the Q worked them to Grand Island. I t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00060.html (17,237 bytes)
7. [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: "Patrick P" <dblp1@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:55:01 -0600; Tom, I doubt that the UP was having units delivered to Chicago for tax purposes. I know that both the Q and the ATSF had units formally delivered in Iowa (West Quincy and Shopton/Fort Madison) to avo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00063.html (12,731 bytes)
8. [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: "rgs20460" <amtrak347@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 01:55:01 -0600; ........ (and it looks like those two middle engines are UP cabless units)? Larry - Definitely, the train is eastbound on Main 3, having just gone over the Brainerd Ave. grade crossing. Looks like yo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00068.html (12,460 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:50:14 -0500; Actually that's an RS27 on the lead, one of fifteen the PRR owned Thank you kindly, Michael Matalis Downers Grove IL You can see my railroad photography blog at http://www.chasingheavymetal.com/blog/; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00071.html (20,272 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: jameskoretsky@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:13:29 +0000 (UTC); Bob, Based on PRR roster information, that's an RS27, not a C424. Here's PC 2407 (Ex PRR 2407)in Little Ferry, NJ in May of 1974. http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=1482822 Regards; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00077.html (13,533 bytes)
11. [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: "james_koretsky" <jameskoretsky@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:55:02 -0600; Larry and All, I guess the thing that I find most interesting about this shot are the Westbound signals for Track 2 and 3. They're off. Was this line using approach lit signals? If so, when did they; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00078.html (13,510 bytes)
12. RE: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 12:56:02 -0600; One of them made it all the way to Denver on at least one occasion; I'll try to scan my photo of it and post it. Hol Wagner To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com From: mmatalis@sprynet.com Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00080.html (18,885 bytes)
13. RE: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Frederick Ripley <fjr68@live.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:03:31 -0500; OK, here are four images shot during 1967-68 at Lincoln and Denver of mixed Q. UP and PRR power. PRR provided EMDs, GEs and ALCOs. Hol Hol, Those are neat shots- thanks for posting! My impression is; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00083.html (15,233 bytes)
14. RE: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:07:49 -0600; The Pennsy power was all supposed to go through to Grand Island and North Platte, but Lincoln often broke up the power sets and rearranged them, and that's why PRR power -- and NYC units after the PC; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00084.html (16,109 bytes)
15. RE: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Frederick Ripley <fjr68@live.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:16:03 -0500; Hol and List, I see. Were there sometimes more than one set of pool power headed to/from Grand Island in the same direction on a given day, or was it pretty much just one set each way? Fred R. The Pe; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00085.html (14,746 bytes)
16. RE: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:20:47 -0600; Normal scheduling called for one set a day. To: cbq@yahoogroups.com From: fjr68@live.com Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:16:03 -0500 Subject: RE: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power Hol and List, I see. Were there somet; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00087.html (15,342 bytes)
17. [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lsallee@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:55:02 -0600; James, I'm not sure why the color doesn't show on those signals in this particular scan, but in all the time I spent trackside there I don't ever remember the signals off. They were always lit. This; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00088.html (13,098 bytes)
18. Re: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 21:49:01 -0500; Could they have been flashing yellow and you happened to catch them between beats? Thank you kindly, Michael Matalis Downers Grove IL You can see my railroad photography blog at http://www.chasinghea; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00089.html (20,767 bytes)
19. [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lsallee@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:55:01 -0600; That's an even better possible explanation, as I think they did (and still do?)flash in unison? Larry -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/C; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00093.html (14,479 bytes)
20. Re: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:06:31 -0500; Yes, M1 and M2's current default setting at that location is flashing yellow, I just had no idea if it was that way at the time of the photo. Thank you kindly, Michael Matalis Downers Grove IL You ca; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00094.html (24,159 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]