To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power |
From: | "james_koretsky" <jameskoretsky@comcast.net> |
Date: | Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:49:31 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1344268175; bh=na18SldBRYKj5vUFIJ9PmCsrlNZ1bCia8/af/EW8jSQ=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SDM8atHa0DImu4hJyL5jUxpsTZ6Y+CNc0DY3cJVox0Ex+RWnLMRSbM+KsBAHqKwNMseaBlwprQlT6DD0mwiMFBvzhD2iVllIyLBcBsu19F5xqSaQqJyiZ7iCFrC4MaFo |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=GVMiqx6oWL+uqr5EBvv5JbB0qWmSe9uz3qnlurRpLw3LlVUqybyuPT0OyVcewlSYEv6FT7dsy9o4rbh9xRSrG7dNCh63nty4RmB2brReC8ccY5DwsdyleWMv4B3iF6XL; |
In-reply-to: | <jvjegh+ujd8@eGroups.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "Larry" <lsallee@...> wrote: > > Okay, now I've got another shot here > <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/UEEHSBgx_k4vY3l2bC_rStMTjNZETYmyP\ > Jy0liipFm0?feat=directlink> I have questions about. Anyone > know/guess/speculate about what this train might have been and why it > would have had only PRR and UP power (and it looks like those two middle > engines are UP cabless units)? > > Larry > Larry and All, I guess the thing that I find most interesting about this shot are the Westbound signals for Track 2 and 3. They're off. Was this line using approach lit signals? If so, when did they switch to being on always from Approach lit? James ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power, jameskoretsky |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] GI-67 and 68 interchange between CB&Q and UP (was: PRR-UP power), Scott Manley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] GI-67 and 68 interchange between CB&Q and UP (was: PRR-UP power), wade griffis |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Re: PRR-UP power, Larry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |