Mail Archive Search: <+from:vlbg@i...>

Results:

References: [ +from:vlbg@i...: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] #5632 O-5 4-8-4: Ever Burn Coal ? (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 13:20:21 -0600; Bill, I can not find a single oil burning O5A on a 01-Apr-45 assignment sheet. At that particular time the 5632 was assigned to the Aurora Division as was the 5629. 5614,5631,5633 were assigned to th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00018.html (8,901 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] 42'10" Fishbelly Flat Cars (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:21:52 -0600; Dan, An October 1960 ORER does not list any cars in the 90xxx series. Russ -- Original Message -- From: "Dan Almosnino" <danalm@w...> To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com> Cc: "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m..; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00033.html (8,419 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Lyons Belt Rwy. and Riverside. (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 23:10:44 -0600; All, When I left the Chicago area in 1979 that trackage extended almost all the way to the abandoned quarry. AT&SF would usually have it stuffed full of tank cars. Sort of strange because this meant; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00053.html (10,009 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Serendipity! (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:33:56 -0500; Dave, Number of that car should be CB&Q 47479. As best as I can tell it is the only car that was built in '63 in series 47000-47499 that still exists. The renumbered BN series is empty as are the few; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00108.html (7,361 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Fwd: [Midrail] Re: "Q" Centennial Cutoff questions (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 22:59:12 -0500; All, Trains operate from West Quincy or Thomas Hill to Kansas City. Unless there is someone still hanging on with a guarantee there will be no Clerical employees there and they would not be called "O; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00141.html (10,709 bytes)
6. Brookfield Missouri (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 19:57:29 -0500; To Whomever Asked, To the best of my knowledge there are no BNSF Clerical Employees at Brookfield MO. Russ; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00151.html (6,004 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 21:13:55 -0500; Tom, If I can ever get my web site published again there are consists from '67 that show the F usage. Generally A's only with anything else in the middle. A F3A-U30B-F7A consist would be common. When; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00152.html (8,172 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 09:48:31 -0500; Gordon, CB&Q GP7, GP9, SD7, & SD9 units, (but not C&S), were built with brake schedule 6BLQ. One of the thing that they did not have was an actuating hose MU capability. Many were straight piped thru; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00155.html (10,641 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 16:42:07 -0500; Ray, Thought the questions were about the last years of the CB&Q F units. BN 784 was Ex BN 9818, Exx NP 6704C, Nee NP 7011D a F9A. That unit was a 24-RL-MC-1 unit originally built for passenger servi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00157.html (9,181 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 21:01:37 -0500; Gordon, To the best of my knowledge all NP F9A's and most NP FT through F7 A's had nose MU. The GN fleet was also pretty well complete. The CB&Q avoided nose MU on F's and the only reason I can think; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00160.html (14,881 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] SD-9's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 08:55:52 -0500; Rupert or Maureen, This was done to make the locomotives lighter to target these units for service on light rail branch lines. of controls (on the right side of the cab). Anyone know why? thought tha; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00165.html (8,506 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:20:32 -0500; Ken, The traction motors on a diesel-electric motor can only get rid or a certain amount of heat. Beyond that point they will fail by either shorting or the literal melting of the windings. Presuming; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00166.html (9,957 bytes)
13. Re: [BRHSlist] short-term current rating discussion [was F's] (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 11:44:04 -0500; Dennis, Right. Fingers are fast but brain is slow.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00168.html (12,651 bytes)
14. Re: [BRHSlist] SD-9's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:36:11 -0500; Rupert, The single control was part of a package. No Steam Generators and only a half sized fuel tank. It all adds up.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00175.html (8,051 bytes)
15. Re: [BRHSlist] Quincy,Il (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 04:50:40 -0500; Leo, Wasn't that part of Marblehead Lime?; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00183.html (7,595 bytes)
16. Re: [BRHSlist] Step Off (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:23:51 -0500; Leo/Pete, As I recall it Engine Crews also used this arrangement at Aurora at least in the summer of '66. They didn't seem to wait in the depot much but liked the tower. Never really noticed Trainmen; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00210.html (8,613 bytes)
17. Re: [BRHSlist] Step Off (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:19:52 -0500; Leo, Was not exactly a secret. Some nights it was noticed at Congress Park. For a while in the 70's they were having #82 pick up everything at Rochelle. Since they already had Congress Park cars on t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00229.html (9,601 bytes)
18. Re: [BRHSlist] LaCrosse (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:37:57 -0500; The freight main line was always single track. The passenger main ran via downtown. Is it a bottleneck? Yes it is. Chances of change? Zero. South of Grand Crossing it crosses a wetland area and South; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00242.html (7,578 bytes)
19. Re: [BRHSlist] LaCrosse (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:13:22 -0500; Steve, What was not re-installed after floods? That was East Winona not La Crosse. The bridges at Crawford and Mears were built as single track. Never any double track there. For that matter it was s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00260.html (8,459 bytes)
20. Re: [BRHSlist] Run-throughs (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:43:16 -0500; Bryan, UP has trackage rights over BNSF between Chicago and Kansas City. It was probably a UP train. In addition the old concept of "run throughs" really does not apply any more. Railroads use other; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00265.html (9,102 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]