BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] SD-9's

To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] SD-9's
From: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 08:55:52 -0500
References: <000e01c1e377$6a6c9980$72d2adcb@r...>
Rupert or Maureen,

This was done to make the locomotives lighter to target these units for service
on light rail branch lines.

Russ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@i...>
To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, 14 April, 2002 00:44
Subject: [BRHSlist] SD-9's


> Listers
>
> The group of SD-9's #440-459 was built in Augsut/September 1957 with only a 
> single set
of controls (on the right side of the cab). Anyone know why?
>
> Some immediate thoughts were centred on economy and experimentation, but I 
> would have
thought that the reduction in cost would have been insignificant in the overall 
cost of
the units, so economy doesn't seem a likely reason. I don't think this could be 
an
experiment or it would have been tried out by using only one set of controls on 
a unit
from the previous series, and buying 20 "experimental" units seems unlikely.
>
> The "next" group of SD-9's - #330-339 with two sets of controls and just 270 
> lb
heavier - was built in October 1957 compared to the August/September dates for 
the 440-459
series. However, the builder's numbers for the two groups show the opposite to 
be the
case.
>
> Operationally, being uni-directional would appear to be a disadvantage unless 
> they were
MU'ed back to back.
>
> Any suggestions? And were any converted later to two sets of controls?
>
> Rupert
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>