BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] LaCrosse

To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] LaCrosse
From: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:13:22 -0500
References: <aa003h+lrkd@e...> <005601c1eaf1$48ab7a60$cd703ed8@h...>
Steve,

What was not re-installed after floods? That was East Winona
not La Crosse. The bridges at Crawford and Mears were built
as single track. Never any double track there.

For that matter it was single track North of Alma until the late 20's.

Russ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven Holding" <hold-on@s...>
To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 23 April, 2002 12:55
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] LaCrosse


> Not reinstalled after the massive flood in the late '60 as well as other
> places . E Winona, Trevino, PDC.
> Yes they are bottlenecks. BUT that is modern railroading. Reason why
> truckers beat us
> sjh
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: krugcpa <krugcpa@y...>
> To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:29 PM
> Subject: [BRHSlist] LaCrosse
> 
> 
> > I had a few minutes to look at Grand Crossing on Saturday. I was
> > surprised to see a single track south out of the yard, because I
> > thought this was a double track line north of Savannah except for
> > some bridges and a short segment well north of LaCrosse. Was I
> > looking in the right direction? If so, is this a bottleneck and a
> > problem?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>