BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Any Burlington Route signal experts out there?

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Any Burlington Route signal experts out there?
From: Rob Adams <steamera@netins.net>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 22:45:03 -0500
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <15FC83E3-B2D5-4367-B90F-DB4A0E4DD8BD@burlingtongulf.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <252.a3b9c2a.318823e4@aol.com> <4456D1B3.7060803@netins.net> <15FC83E3-B2D5-4367-B90F-DB4A0E4DD8BD@burlingtongulf.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
Stan;

I do still have it.  It has a multitude of brown mold/mildew speckles on 
the back of it.  I am going to look into the possibility of removing it, 
but obviously the process will have to be a gentle one or the negative 
will be permanently damaged.   Many of the negs were in pretty tough 
shape.  They obviously had not been stored properly, but at least they 
survived.

Kind regards, Rob

Stan Maddox wrote:

>Rob,
>
>You mentioned the negative was ruined. Can you be more specific? If  
>it wasn't physically mutilated (scratched or shredded, for example),  
>it might be salvageable. Do you still have it?
>
>Stan
>
>On May 1, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Rob Adams wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Pete;
>>
>>I'm going to take a shot at scanning some more of the negatives  
>>directly
>>and enhancing them.  The original pictures I posted were scans of
>>darkroom-printed photos (inluding the views of the people and the
>>depot), but frankly there were focus and/or exposure problems with  
>>many
>>of the negs, and their age doesn't serve to enhance any  
>>shortcomings.  I
>>guess we are lucky to have the images at all.  I do believe I can make
>>them better though by scanning them directly and playing with the
>>files.   I wish the negative of the entire signal hadn't been  
>>ruined, as
>>it was kind of a neat shot.  Basically a look to the horizon, with  
>>track
>>sticking up and water on both sides as far as you could see.  I  
>>thought
>>it was interesting how the debris caught on the signal mast ladder had
>>caused the ladder to be twisted by the current of the flood waters.
>>There are many other pictures that I'll share as I'm able to get them
>>scanned and cleaned up.  I really enjoy hearing everyone's input.
>>
>>Best regards, Rob
>>
>>Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I too, would "buy" Glenn's theory..The dress of the workmen, and  
>>>the MOW
>>>equipment all mark all of Rob's photographs, including the others  
>>>on his K&W
>>>Website as 1930's.  Also I agree that the background looks more  
>>>like the
>>>Republican River in Nebraska than the upper Mississippi.
>>>
>>>There are a couple that show a depot in the background with a name  
>>>painted
>>>on the end, but it's not distinguishable..Would it be possible to  
>>>enhance one
>>>of  these  to make the town name legible.  That would provide the   
>>>definitive
>>>answer.
>>>
>>>This is fun stuff to look at and discuss.
>>>
>>>Pete
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>-- 
>>Rob Adams
>>Wellman, IA
>>steamera@netins.net
>>Modeling CB&Q, CRI&P and Wabash operations in Keokuk, IA,
>>the Wabash Bluffs, IL to Keokuk branch,
>>and the CB&Q's Keokuk & Western branch, circa 1938
>><http://www.KeokukandWesternRR.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Rob Adams
Wellman, IA
steamera@netins.net
Modeling CB&Q, CRI&P and Wabash operations in Keokuk, IA,
the Wabash Bluffs, IL to Keokuk branch, 
and the CB&Q's Keokuk & Western branch, circa 1938
<http://www.KeokukandWesternRR.com>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>