Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+TRAIN\s+ORDERS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+TRAIN\s+ORDERS\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: archie hayden <kliner@mywdo.com>; Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:27:38 -0500; -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http:; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00001.html (12,008 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: Eva Hanger <mrslandser@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:45:37 -0700 (PDT); As I go through my stack of TOs, both those I wrote and those I have accumulated along the way, my favorite is a simple 31 from the Omaha Road dated 29 Oct 1943, 108A< "NO 209 MEET NO 210 AT ST JAM; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00004.html (10,644 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: wohrnell@sbcglobal.net; Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 11:25:41 -0700 (PDT); I relieved R.C. Brown when he was Agent at Pleasantville, IA. I had never seen a collection of TO's he had in the depot office/museum. He had books of TO's, I recall seeing an order issued on the las; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00005.html (10,323 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 22:55:29 -0500; GREAT to see/hear you are up & around Archie! Good too to see that CB&Q, even in 'modern times' took time to honor a great President. We could have quite a display during a clinic on Burlington T.O.'; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00011.html (12,902 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT); One time we had a family of beavers move in along the ROW near Halpin on the Ottumwa Div. Not the best at logging along the tracks they would drop trees on the tracks So an order was put out to look; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00012.html (11,894 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 21:35:00 -0700 (PDT); I would suggest this was the change of a normal scheduled meet as the trains have numbers rather then running as extras. A Scheduled Meet would show up on the timetable schedule with small numbers no; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00013.html (12,492 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 12:33:50 -0400; On the Lincoln Division in the? 50's during county fair time "westward trains via Crete" would get an order reading something like this. Run carefully and use whistle freely while passing through Cre; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00016.html (13,516 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 21:05:27 -0700 (PDT); Pete I am still working on the telegraph call signs SJH On the Lincoln Division in the? 50's during county fair time "westward trains via Crete" would get an order reading something like this. Run ca; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00017.html (13,958 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 14:51:01 -0400; STeve I've got a few from the old Wymore Division if you would like them let me know. Pete Pete I am still working on the telegraph call signs SJH On the Lincoln Division in the? 50's during county f; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00018.html (14,506 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:28:17 -0400; Thanks guys...My little post envoked the response that I had hoped..All who replied supplied good and correct information regarding Quiz Kids..,Train orders and Schaeffer's SCRIPT ink. I didn't think; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00286.html (14,646 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: Cy Svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT); That is not ink on the backside. Traun Orders are writen with double sided carbon paper between each one. That carbon paper also lasts a very long time, you don't have to use a fresh sheet with ea; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00288.html (13,848 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:27:01 -0700 (PDT); OK Pete. I will work one up as soon as I can get unpacked from the move. On the BN we did not use the 31 form but when you needed to restrict a train you just had the op copy the order and when the c; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00301.html (17,214 bytes)
13. [CBQ] Re: Train Orders (score: 1): Author: "mrslandser" <mrslandser@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:17:57 -0600; Reading the emails on train orders has been most interesting. As I review some of the orders that I copied during my days on the BN "dark territory" between Lincoln, NE and Forrest City, MO, I notice; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00302.html (11,064 bytes)
14. [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: wohrnell@sbcglobal.net; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:43:25 -0700 (PDT); Pete, I worked about three months before copying a TO. I was working at Kirkwood when the DS phone rang and he said SD both ways. The DS was crossing a train over between Biggsville and Monmouth, Kir; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00304.html (10,449 bytes)
15. Re: [CBQ] Re: Train Orders (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <normansen@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:12:20 -0500; Jack, Saw information from Steven Holding. Everything makes sense as it would be expected. I had 42 years as Agent/Operator and Dispatching. "Form 31"? I would say that a few existed but would never; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00307.html (13,079 bytes)
16. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <normansen@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:33:32 -0500; Lenny, Many Dispatcher's expected you to be ready. My personal way of that was that I would not even respond until I was ready. Lineup's were very much the same thing. It was supposed to be at 6:00 A; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00308.html (11,836 bytes)
17. RE: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:24:41 -0500; Steve - A clinic on Q T.O's would be great! I have a unqiue one you can show to the group - a 'special' issued on the day of CB&Q Pres. Perkin's burial - all trains to stop for 5" in his honor. Anyon; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00318.html (12,035 bytes)
18. Re: [CBQ] Re: TRAIN ORDERS (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:02:26 -0400; Gerald et al I think that there was a "all trains stop" train order for Murphy's death...I think it was 1968 or so...I'm sure I've seen a copy a fellow railfan here in Lincoln has.. I'll try to get; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00322.html (12,696 bytes)
19. [CBQ] Re: Train orders (score: 1): Author: "graywolfs2" <graywolfs02@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:55:01 -0600; Hi Winton... I'll take a stab at this..... In looking at the orders and seeing that X5000W is to "Wait at A til b and C til d" etc, one would believe X4000E would progress til such a time that there; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-04/msg00221.html (13,161 bytes)
20. [CBQ] Re: Train orders (score: 1): Author: "mdeckergwtcnet" <mdecker@gwtc.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:55:01 -0600; Hi Al......... I worked in train order territory between Edgemont, Gillette, and the mines. There was a register shack at Black Thunder Mine, later "Junction", where the mty would register in, and th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-04/msg00226.html (12,672 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]