Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Heavyweight\s+Q\s+Decals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Heavyweight\s+Q\s+Decals\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:27:15 -0600; Excellent letter. In terms of accurate prototype data, we are indeed fortunate to have Bill Glick's books (4 and counting) to cover the CB&Q heavyweights plus other author's generic Pullman, Std Stee; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00111.html (16,604 bytes)
22. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:42:52 -0600; Bob If you can locate ANY CB&Q lettering drawings in I would be much interested in getting scans of the documents. Most of the Pullman documents I looked at in the Pullman Library collection made ref; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00112.html (13,053 bytes)
23. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Bob <drgw18@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:47:42 -0600; As described earlier, the best method for this is to emulate what the SLHS has done - bring in volunteers who can aid in the research and physical effort required. As the last few times anything like; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00113.html (14,200 bytes)
24. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:00:16 -0600; Bob (?): BRHS is exclusively volunteers except for very minor expense reimbursement to Officers and small payment to our two Editors for pages produced in our respective publications. When you say 'd; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00114.html (14,459 bytes)
25. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Bob <drgw18@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:50:50 -0600; Actually, Gerald, I have brought up the matter of membership and society up to you via email correspondence, and (if you look in the archives), Ted Andersen & I have brought up this specific subject; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00115.html (16,110 bytes)
26. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:01:48 -0500; Before we get too far off topic regarding the CB&Q heavyweight decals, may I remind everyone that Q Connection - not the BRHS - has offered to get a consensus opinion of what should be included in th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00116.html (16,247 bytes)
27. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: estcbq@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:13:33 -0500 (EST); are we only talking decals? how about dry transfers? jim youong Before we get too far off topic regarding the CB&Q heavyweight decals, may I remind everyone that Q Connection - not the BRHS - has off; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00117.html (16,564 bytes)
28. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:23:01 -0600; Bob I didn't mean that you should start a research program to find the drawings I was mentioning. I've not been able to get out to Union to work at the Pullman Library (I've only done it on two prior; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00118.html (14,886 bytes)
29. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:39:48 -0600; JimDry Transfers have pretty much gone out of style although I suppose there are places left where you can still have them made. With the advent of computer graphics programs the commercial art marke; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00119.html (12,232 bytes)
30. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Bob <drgw18@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:57:11 -0600; Charlie, as you know Ted is the curator, and everything of such a nature should be passed through him. We have to schedule work parties for such things due to the lack of "free" time at the Library -; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00121.html (17,433 bytes)
31. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: estcbq@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:51:55 -0500 (EST); Charlie--thanks for the reply--i liked working with transfers--granted they were few and less than few Q available--and concur with your analysis--jim young JimDry Transfers have pretty much gone out; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00122.html (12,894 bytes)
32. [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "calflash22" <jerryglow@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:30:43 -0600; The dry transfer business is drying up. The computer era did it in. At least 2 model RR suppliers of dry transfers have not produced anything in years and will eventually cease supplying the hobby un; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00123.html (11,788 bytes)
33. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:13:35 -0600; Bob I fully understand and agree with your thoughts, having worked at the Pullman Library and understanding the priorities...... So far I have only received one indication of interest, and that from; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00132.html (17,612 bytes)
34. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Jan Kohl <j.kohl@wildblue.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:16:52 -0500; Charlie, I have volunteered my services for documenting CB&Q history, but thus far NO TAKERS! I have a full-size flatbed document/negative scanner and associated software. Cheers! Jan -- Yahoo! Group; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-12/msg00137.html (19,934 bytes)
35. [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:01:32 -0600; Scott - The sets you mention are fine for Pullmans or for hand lettering cars, but Champ is (was) the only company to produce decals for "Burlington" in Railroad Roman extended lettering, so their sh; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-11/msg00297.html (13,629 bytes)
36. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "Myers, Scott V." <svmyers@southernco.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:23:21 -0600; Jonathan, You are correct. I used these decals for Pullman cars and individual lettering for "Burlington", which as you say, is a pain. Scott Myers Scott - The sets you mention are fine for Pullmans; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-11/msg00301.html (15,566 bytes)
37. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Martin <kmartin537@surewest.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:30:48 -0800; I might be wrong but but I believe that before he died Marshall Thayer had done the artwork on a Burlington Passsenger Roman set for Microscale but they have never released it. Maybe with the demise; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-11/msg00307.html (11,705 bytes)
38. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:53:13 -0600; This is an example of where we need to fill that post of "Industry Liaison" for BRHS. I was in correspondence (and even a visit) before Marsh died and indeed he had completed that set of drwgs for Mi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-11/msg00309.html (12,705 bytes)
39. Re: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:05:48 -0600; Once again, here's a plea..... SOMEBODY has to have, or know who has, CB&Q Railroad Roman lettering (stenciling) drawings for Passenger Cars, Freight Cars, and Locomotives..... Yes, we can work off o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-11/msg00311.html (12,258 bytes)
40. RE: [CBQ] Re: Heavyweight Q Decals (score: 1): Author: Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:52:37 -0600; This is an example of where we need to fill that post of "Industry Liaison" for BRHS. I was in correspondence (and even a visit) before Marsh died and indeed he had completed that set of drwgs for Mi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-11/msg00313.html (12,736 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]