Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+BRHS\s+Vitality\s+$Action\s+Item$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+BRHS\s+Vitality\s+$Action\s+Item$\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (ACTION ITEM) (score: 1): Author: "Lee Edgar" <litehousekeeper@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:58:37 -0600; Charlie, It is good of you to champion call for energizing the growth and membership of BRHS ~ all excellent points and suggestions, moreso I believe they are critical. In my humble opinion, BRHS has; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00198.html (14,746 bytes)
2. [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: "Lee Edgar" <litehousekeeper@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:46:05 -0600; Charlie/All It is good of you to champion call for spurring the growth and membership of BRHS ~ all excellent points and suggestions, more so I believe they are critical. It appears to me that BRHS h; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00199.html (15,021 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:30:49 -0500; Lee - there have been joint meets before, I believe the latest was the AT&SF - Streator meet a few years back. Bob Webber [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo! Groups Links; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00202.html (13,701 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:10:20 -0500; There have only been TWO true joint meets - with RITS (Rock Island) in Texas some yrs ago and with IC in Dbq 3 yrs ago. The other so-called joints have been us holding an normal meet & inviting anoth; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00210.html (16,434 bytes)
5. RE: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:25:56 -0500; Sorry Gerald, but that would be a real issue. The GNHS does not sell their publications to non-members - including those of obviously interested societies (like the BRHS). They don't sell them throug; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00211.html (15,123 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:15:18 EDT; Although a joint meet between the Hill roads would be an outstanding event, hate to dash cold water here but that will never happen. We are shortly approaching the 39th anniversary of the founding on; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00212.html (11,417 bytes)
7. RE: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:56:20 -0500; I was not considering joint publications, just a joint meet every so many yrs (although a Hills Line publication was a fact at one time as the forefunner to the various 'prototype' modeling mags was; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00214.html (16,463 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Bryan Howell <tubaman21@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:08:58 -0700 (PDT); I fail to see how the fact that the GNHS keeps their publications limited to members only would preclude them from participating in a joint meet. I think its a great idea. As a Q fan born about 15 ye; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00215.html (12,197 bytes)
9. RE: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:15:21 -0500; I'm not saying anything about publishing - just that they guard their information very closely and don't allow non-member to purchase it - if they can't purchase their publications, I doubt they will; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00216.html (17,997 bytes)
10. RE: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:15:09 -0500; I don't ever recall significant animosity between the operating roads (a bit between NP/GN as they paralleled & fought for some of the same traffic but not like NYC vs. PRR) and never have seen animo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00217.html (15,308 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Bryan Howell <tubaman21@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:42:09 -0700 (PDT); In taking a look at the GNRHS website, it looks as if they have recently become more lax with their information. While you still cannot purchase the primary publication itself, the equivalent of arti; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00218.html (12,708 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:30:12 -0500; There is nothing to be lost in asking. I'm glad they loosened up a little. It would be great to see them open it up more, but that is obviously their call. Bob Webber [Non-text portions of this messa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00219.html (14,195 bytes)
13. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:31:55 EDT; Bryan, We asked the GN/NP to have joint meets many times in the 1990's. There was emphatically no interest in doing anything with the BRHS. Perhaps the times have changed. The GN group was very helpf; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00221.html (11,999 bytes)
14. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Bryan Howell <tubaman21@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:11:04 -0700 (PDT); Thanks for that info, Rich. That is unfortunate. Perhaps the leadership of the organizations have seen enough overturn in the past decade for something positive to occur. Bryan J. Howell ____________; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00226.html (12,599 bytes)
15. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Jan Kohl <kohlj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:35:25 -0400; I'm with Bryan...I have, on occasion, dealt with members of the NP & GN groups, I wasn't aware there was any animosity until this conversation, and frankly, it sounds like whatever attitude may have; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00227.html (13,432 bytes)
16. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:59:11 EDT; Jan, I was a member of all three Societies all through the 1990's. We approached them many times to try to do a joint meet in Minneapolis/St. Paul. There was no - repeat, no - interest on their part; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00236.html (13,180 bytes)
17. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: Jan Kohl <kohlj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:03:40 -0400; Rich, I agree, and I'm not saying what people experienced back in the 90s wasn't problematic. I'm just thinking ahead for another 10 years and thinking we could be in worse shape than now, and wishin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00238.html (14,244 bytes)
18. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:29:26 EDT; Jan, I was simply answering Gerald's email commenting that the 3 Hill lines had never had a joint meet. I was pointing out that I know, for a fact, that the BRHS tried to do this throughout the 1990'; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00242.html (15,058 bytes)
19. RE: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: "Steve Haas $G2$" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:10:27 -0700; "The GN's last convention in Minneapolis/St. Paul was in 2001. They are already slated for Glacier Park, Montana, for 2010." GNRHS tentatively plans convention locations a couple-three years in advan; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00244.html (13,385 bytes)
20. Re: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:21:13 EDT; This is exactly correct - adding to the difficulty of trying to coordinate a joint meet. The GN/NP meets are always in July, as well. This presents a timing problem with the BRHS's fall meet schedule; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00245.html (13,081 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]