Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CBQ] C&S .shipments of Sunrise iron ore to Pueblo. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 06:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings All, During the early 1950s did the C&S ship haematite to Pueblo in: C&S gondolas C&S hoppers Q gondolas/ hoppers? foreign road gondolas/ hoppers. Presumably the Ingolbys were gone by then.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2006-04/msg00017.html (9,835 bytes)

22. [CBQ] C&S employees (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:48:58 -0800 (PST)
Greetings All, The C&S and the AT&SF entered into the "Joint Line Agreement" which became opertional in April 1900. Under the Agreement the ATSF assumed the manning of all C&S trains on the new Denve
/archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00020.html (9,914 bytes)

23. [CBQ] C&S employees (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Greetings All, A follow on question, if I may. The AT&SF under the Agreement provided all train crew including driver, fireman and conductor. C&S and the AT&SF way cars operated "chain gang" fashion
/archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00021.html (9,813 bytes)

24. [CBQ] Colorado Springs - The Joint Line Agreement (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 01:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Greetings All, Tee AT&SF originally had a coal tressle at its depot in Colorado Springs. This was burnt to the ground in the late 20s/ early 30s. It was replaced by oiling facilities. The AT&SF switc
/archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00022.html (9,709 bytes)

25. [CBQ] Ore from Sunrise Mine to Minnequa. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings All, I am still on the search for photos 1940 - 1950 of C&S gons carrying haematite from Sunrise WO to the Colorado Fuel and Iron plant at Minnequa CO. I discovered this little gem. http://
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-05/msg00022.html (9,706 bytes)

26. [CBQ] Sunrise Ore Shipments (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings All, Both the C&S and the CB&Q shipped haematite (an iron ore) from the Sunrise Mine in Wyoming to the Minnequa Steel works south of Pueblo, Colorado. What type(s) of cars was the ore shipp
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-04/msg00188.html (10,392 bytes)

27. Re: [CBQ] Sunrise Ore Shipments (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings everyone. Many thanks for your input. I have six Tichy USRA hopper waiting patiently for assembly. I need to search out some photos circa 1951 to confirm the C&S paint scheme - I think the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-04/msg00197.html (10,686 bytes)

28. [CBQ] C&S Connor Branch (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 04:16:01 -0800 (PST)
Greetings All, For many years the C&S retained the Connors branch (formerly part of the old D&NO line part of which was abondoned when the C&S ran over the ATSF trackage between Denver South and Brag
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-03/msg00009.html (10,132 bytes)

29. Re: [CBQ] Stories (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Greetings Leo, I agree. Most railroad machinery is impressive. But it is nothing without the good humoured, honest day to day toil of the majority of railroad employees (and the families that support
/archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00096.html (10,293 bytes)

30. Re: [CBQ] C&S Caboose (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 02:20:58 -0800 (PST)
Greetings John, Ahhhh, the Glorious C&S!!!!. Two possibilities.  1. A reasonable C&S way car could be kit bashed from the Walthers wood caboose that came out a couple of years ago. The body length ne
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-12/msg00039.html (11,313 bytes)

31. Re: [CBQ] Re: [DRGW] Re: Hudsons on the Joint Line (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings Norm, Wow! Many thanks to Hol. for this excellent information. Regards, Mark -- Original Message -- From: Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@worldnet.att.net> To: DRGW@yahoogroups.com; cbq@yahoogroups
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-08/msg00058.html (14,774 bytes)

32. Re: [CBQ] C&S Crewing rights over the Joint Line. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 04:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings All,   The D&RG laid down a third rail on their line from Denver to Pueblo in 1881; this allowed the standard gouge trains to operate Denver - Pueblo.   The AT&SF laid its own line Pueblo t
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-07/msg00012.html (16,828 bytes)

33. Re: [CBQ] C&S Crewing rights over the Joint Line. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 04:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings Pete, How is your memory? Coudl you recall the train number, or the railroad and or the time of day and direction you took for your trip over the Joint Line? This will help me fix a bench m
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-07/msg00013.html (17,055 bytes)

34. Re: [CBQ] C&S Crewing rights over the Joint Line. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings Pete, That would be wonderful. Many thanks. Mark Mark I can get it found, but it may take awhile...I know the year was 1954...think I put 55 on my original post.? The month would have been
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-07/msg00024.html (18,177 bytes)

35. Re: [CBQ] C&S Crewing rights over the Joint Line. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings, I agree with what you say. Just because Jay Gould was dead, there were still his camp followers to deal with. But, as you say, they did not have the "master's touch". It took lot more than
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-07/msg00025.html (18,105 bytes)

36. Re: [CBQ] C&S Crewing rights over the Joint Line. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 21:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings Pete, You are brilliant. Well done. And many thanks. Mark Mark...Believe it or not I found what you wanted to know. August 24, 1954 Denver-- Colo Spgs...No. 1? Texas Zephyr...... My 1953 Gu
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-07/msg00034.html (19,020 bytes)

37. [CBQ] C&S Crewing rights over the Joint Line. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings All,   Pardon me if I have asked this question before.   The Joint Line ran between South Denver and Pueblo, Colorado. In 1899, with subsequent renewals in 1900, 1915 etc, the Colorado & So
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-06/msg00160.html (11,494 bytes)

38. Re: [CBQ] C&S Crewing rights over the Joint Line. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings Russ,   I have copies of the Joint Operating Agreements of 1900, 1915 and 1940. Plus the maps.   Certainly the D&RG(W) always (beware of Murphy's Law) ran their own trains.   And I believe
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-06/msg00164.html (14,068 bytes)

39. Re: [CBQ] C&S Crewing rights over the Joint Line. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings Pete. Wow. That is great!! Thanks for sharing the memories. Mark Pete The D&RGW / D&RG also ran the MP, CRI&P and AT&SF trains. Before the Santa Fe built their line north from Colorado Spri
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-06/msg00167.html (16,653 bytes)

40. Re: [CBQ] C&S Crewing rights over the Joint Line. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Greetings All,   As I understand it:   Denver.  Switchers lettered "C&S over AT&SF"  Operated by C&S crews  Owned/ leased by C&S   Colorado Springs & Pueblo  Switchers lettered "AT&SF" over "C&S"  Op
/archives/BRHSLIST/2008-06/msg00174.html (15,001 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu