Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rgz17@comcast.net: 255 ]

Total 255 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [CBQ] Pre-War Budd Cars (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:47:11 -0500
C&S E5A 9955 at scrap line in 1970... "Charlie Vlk" n_cbqguy Sun Sep 2, 2012 8:05 pm (PDT) . Posted by: They were built in 1938 - the original edit had that, then I made it more readable, and lost it
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-09/msg00026.html (17,176 bytes)

222. Re: [CBQ] C&S Wyoming District passenger train delays and consists - 1917. (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 17:10:25 -0500
Interesting that these trains consistently had older, (originally) wooden Pullman 12-1s assigned.. I'd have to look and see, they might have been SUFed or SUVed, but they were still much older cars t
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-09/msg00078.html (14,437 bytes)

223. [CBQ] Have some fun... from 1929 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:48:46 -0500
Take a look at the map here: http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/lib/public/full_screen.html?http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/su/maps/chigov/G3700-s24-G4-IL-Chicago-Loop-1929/ and have fun locating the current
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-09/msg00179.html (10,819 bytes)

224. [CBQ] Walthers "new" passenger train.... (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 19:05:00 -0500
.... is a variation of the C&O version of the Pere Marquette. The important thing for those of us who model the CZ, DZ and even the Blackhawk or the Mainstreeter and Western Star is the 10-6 (Plan 41
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00029.html (10,133 bytes)

225. Re: [CBQ] C&S Trains #29 and #30 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:06:25 -0500
If you can provide the Pullman names, I can provide the information on the cars themselves. At 07:38 AM 8/11/2012, you wrote: Dave, when I find some time (I have two sisters in hospice care right now
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00160.html (17,168 bytes)

226. Re: [CBQ] C&S Trains #29 and #30 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:00:01 -0500
If this information is helpful, I'll pull the others: SHILOH was a 12-1 with smoking room, originally assigned to the PRR. Plan 1581-B built 1902 DUNKIRK was a 12-1 General Service Plan 1581-F built
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00165.html (22,514 bytes)

227. RE: [CBQ] Olympus Scrapped (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:24:59 -0500
SILVER BEAVER, WP baggage car. At 04:20 PM 8/19/2012, you wrote: Hi Bryan, Working on Zephyr 65?Have you heard which car is going, or has gone to IRM? Dave --Original Message-- From: CBQ@yahoogroups.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00228.html (12,569 bytes)

228. Re: [CBQ] HO Modeling help (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:08:15 -0500
Did you check with Tom @ NKP Car? I would have to assume he has the doors given that he brought out a variety of Q head end cars, including MBE & BE cars. At 11:53 AM 7/16/2012, you wrote: I have sea
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-07/msg00124.html (12,395 bytes)

229. Re: [CBQ] Question on expansion (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:56:25 -0500
The simple answer is that, just as the UP has found, the D&RGW & WP were never conducive to high traffic density, and it was much more efficient (not to mention cost-effective) to grab rights (as a r
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-07/msg00226.html (14,132 bytes)

230. Re: [CBQ] Re: Sleeping Car Poplar Branch/Flat et, al. (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:43:16 -0500
Pullman was most certainly NOT out of business! The 1948 Divestiture split the Pullman-Standard company into two major entities - the car building (Pullman-Standard) and the car operating (Pullman Co
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-06/msg00107.html (14,572 bytes)

231. Re: [CBQ] NYC and PRR 10-6 Sleepers on the CZ (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 08:02:21 -0500
Yes, Oct. 1957. But, being pedantic - there was no arrangement to have NYC & PRR 10-6s run on the CZ on alternating days. The PRR's car, SILVER RAPIDS and a car leased from one of the other roads in
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-05/msg00077.html (13,234 bytes)

232. RE: [CBQ] NYC and PRR 10-6 Sleepers on the CZ (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:56:18 -0500
While some NYC 10-6s showed up on the CZ in the post 1957 era, by far more common were the 4-4-2s. 10-6s were the most popular LW car design, and, like the PRR, they tried to keep them "home". If you
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-05/msg00085.html (15,363 bytes)

233. RE: [CBQ] NYC and PRR 10-6 Sleepers on the CZ (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:53:21 -0500
Therein lies the problem with car diagrams. They're great - until you want to know what they actually LOOKED like. RR diagrams are not always correct and they don't really portray the windos band as
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-05/msg00091.html (18,300 bytes)

234. [CBQ] San Traps on Budd cars (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 14:35:20 -0500
On Train Orders, there is a thread related to the Sand Traps on the Budd-built cars of (approx.) 1952. The first plan having them that I have seen was the BURLINGTON, and they lasted into the CZ SILV
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-07/msg00006.html (10,872 bytes)

235. Re: [CBQ] Sand Traps on Budd cars (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 18:39:40 -0500
Someone replied to the thread: As some have guessed, the sanding systems were related to the braking, in particular to the wheel slide system. The Proceedings of the 1948 Annual Meeting of the Air Br
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-07/msg00008.html (17,018 bytes)

236. RE: [CBQ] Abandonment of Original C&S Denver-Colo Springs Line (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:47:36 -0500
Just to be complete - the Santa Fe was the reason the D&RG bought SG equipment. The D&RG had a line from Denver to Colo. Springs (3'), and the Santa Fe wanted to get into Denver. The D&RG laid a thir
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-07/msg00042.html (14,203 bytes)

237. Re: [CBQ] RPO structural requirements (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:49:18 -0500
Rupert, the specifications varied by era, and can be found in the Post Office Publication 19 "A Publication of the Post Ofice department" "Specification for the Construction of Fulll and Apartment Ra
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-06/msg00032.html (18,933 bytes)

238. Re: [CBQ] FW: RPO structural requirements (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:18:10 -0500
Rupert, that was what was meant as part of the sentence: " The buffing static load ranged from 50,000 to 400,000 pounds depending upon the total weight of empty train (pounds). " Basically, the requi
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-06/msg00042.html (14,673 bytes)

239. Re: [CBQ] Q Parlor cars (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 12:36:14 -0500
Just to be clear - this is an N Scale car painted for Burlington, with Burlington on the letterboard and "CB&Q 4515" in the middle of the lower panel. The car is a Plan 3416 28-1 (28 seats, 1 drawing
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-05/msg00057.html (14,197 bytes)

240. Re: [CBQ] Intermountain XM-32 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 06:38:04 -0500
Rich, somewhere around here I have the same cars, and I had decals made. I got trucks from Athearn - haven't tried them out yet. I think I have a 4-pack of the cars in red too that I have to find a h
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-04/msg00061.html (12,482 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu