To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] NYC and PRR 10-6 Sleepers on the CZ |
From: | Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net> |
Date: | Wed, 09 May 2012 08:02:21 -0500 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1336568544; bh=lqGTt3kWBZ6Qr77AEeySpbOZhYEMCmu5TRKB/uyrR5Q=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-Id:X-Mailer:To:In-Reply-To:References:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=ieI3wcPbspMKtjDi3qWDaarYBhDaw9I7ZCejTW81Gn6tXFTI3Am8eZooe3EqC48BaTJDPVR7htv4vX9lP+g7VhlvEzE48uiq+1OVmJpPVzW/4qhvC5JjY986UzOJtcEG |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=jVwT3kgVgB8GAGaprAFadcarV9LC9VFz1aDew83g/3DSXZ5xq+kESltrZJimee+D4oE4GUtAbN6uQPDnEBgPDh6R6jak0jNLS2NXdyXt4A9d0dMA1rryIIzKOtirasgh; |
In-reply-to: | <8CEFBF5750AB15C-1454-12092@angweb-usm022.sysops.aol.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <BLU159-W3211EE424735AE8D3E7DE0B4110@phx.gbl> <8CEFBF5750AB15C-1454-12092@angweb-usm022.sysops.aol.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Yes, Oct. 1957. But, being pedantic - there was no arrangement to have NYC & PRR 10-6s run on the CZ on alternating days. The PRR's car, SILVER RAPIDS and a car leased from one of the other roads in the consortium were used as the contributions to the pool by the PRR & NYC respectively. The other days, it was a typical consortium owned and operated (though Pullman staffed) car. The NYC often used a VALLEY series car, which you can see on many CZs (trucks and roofs are the main tip-offs). The PRR was a full member of the consortium, the NYC was not. The NYC connection could be a bit hairy given the change of terminals. And, just because the through car agreements ended in 1957, that did not mean the end of NYC & PRR cars on the CZ - quite the contrary, they showed up far more often. At 07:21 AM 5/9/2012, you wrote: Ricky, __._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] NYC and PRR 10-6 Sleepers on the CZ, rgortowski |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Signal gantries at Buda, Paul Evans |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] NYC and PRR 10-6 Sleepers on the CZ, rgortowski |
Next by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] NYC and PRR 10-6 Sleepers on the CZ, Rick Keil |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |