To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] FW: RPO structural requirements |
From: | Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net> |
Date: | Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:18:10 -0500 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1370477894; bh=JNLCoVnwewUDDKO5xuiJuk0tWdOVnPGdf0tk7CRdq/o=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-Id:X-Mailer:To:In-Reply-To:References:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=EmYfNyPnPeFWD2NaqhT0Xt+ODAO+G3rjpaLYS5wfP8EP1cXyXvWAKJXKp0TFjggOxICD2eXe3oQKUAzPMBxEL/Dgg4QREG4Io3fd5lOFRURLeFrEej4HRVAQi9jC9AzhlyEhMaykCHFfPn0AQ62HUInR4WdfdpF5dBoY+r3Ak0k= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=fEbP+T/P6TzVb6bxVyWKYXnG+67T9H3TqCMQDRDvlgBPXeEahClIson3WLNxZX+/W2cWIvMQZDMuEBeHG+JoMXxP7Un8zzciiFUNZDYbOkqP8mRP1R1dXf/4keBcOnkcqwqhHqIu7moKv3ZAJkIXroQXgb2UT/KTZUnCRbX0iqQ=; |
In-reply-to: | <0ACF6B68374F4D2D9E66723CA6289643@USUS> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <0ACF6B68374F4D2D9E66723CA6289643@USUS> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Rupert, that was what was meant as part of the sentence: " The buffing static load ranged from 50,000 to 400,000 pounds depending upon the total weight of empty train (pounds). " Basically, the requirement was predicated on the desire for that car (the mail car of whatever configuration) to be the strongest car in the train and to avoid telescoping and other (at the time of the first directive in 1913) common (fatal) incidents. On the other hand, waivers were allowed for trains with lesser weights and strengths) - i.e. lower static loads. I should have specifically mentioned the truss rod car in relation to that, sorry. At 08:48 PM 6/4/2013, you wrote: Some information obtained by Philip Weibler on the RPO truss rod question __._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CBQ] Omaha Depot, Dave Lotz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Omaha Depot, Noel Crawford |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] FW: RPO structural requirements, Rupert & Maureen |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Rio Grande Zephyr set for sale., Dave Leasure |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |