To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Cab Signals (was PRR-UP power) |
From: | "thommack" <thommack@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:22:39 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1344522162; bh=ee6o4k7Lvx5MxDwXB7uDcMUsrNWwqr2DvQ+3fHj7rus=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=aZFq620aZAW2sgp5GXr1veOBpE/3ddT4iCxUqLnASErzmnEiPvFc1ryunEERL0+efX27CMPS/N91GXK0sPQ4bsk+TJP3qm38sdoPCkIIO517UCtdCb1eJ3HSjht11g+x |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=Px0N3WUWj60dHfd/YxIfMQUT5Z2S6rBSeTMNAVkQSdyAWon3r/qU3Aa6DkFYUWTT6DkBaGvQW1DF0CaVYCya1wVxUhdp+7ffkgs7T/SG4nkKhI/G2sB2902oE+2Rxut0; |
In-reply-to: | <jvjegh+ujd8@eGroups.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
A friend of mine who is well acquainted with the Union Pacific brought up cab control signal (CCS) implications. This train would have needed UP style CCS from Grand Island to North Platte on the UP. He asked whether PRR or CB&Q required Cab Signal or ATS on freight for their sections? On westbound was a UP CCS leader added at Grand Island to replace the PRR one? I did not think CB&Q had cab signals in their freight units. The PRR might have for northeast operations, but I don't know. Can anyone shed light on this cab signal conundrum? Tom Mack Cincinnati, OH --- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "Larry" <lsallee@...> wrote: > > Okay, now I've got another shot here > <https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/UEEHSBgx_k4vY3l2bC_rStMTjNZETYmyP\ > Jy0liipFm0?feat=directlink> I have questions about. Anyone > know/guess/speculate about what this train might have been and why it > would have had only PRR and UP power (and it looks like those two middle > engines are UP cabless units)? > > Larry > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CBQ] Re: Zephyr 63/64, William Barber |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Cab Signals (was PRR-UP power), HOL WAGNER |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Flashing Aspects, Michael Matalis |
Next by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Cab Signals (was PRR-UP power), HOL WAGNER |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |