Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Milwaukee\s+261at\s+Oregon\,\s+IL\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: atsf3460@a...
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 23:42:56 EDT
Like Rich, I too enjoyed getting to see Milwaukee #261 this past weekend. Not too hard to pretend our '95 Taurus station wagon was really a '55 Nomad on US34 and #261 was really #5632! Hopefully BNSF
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00177.html (7,507 bytes)

2. RE: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: TOM KOCH <tom.koch@a...>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 23:06:20 -0500
Rich and others, I drove down to Montgomery and spent an hour waiting for her to go through on Sunday morning with 12 cars in tow. She did look great. We stood where the Fox River Branch broke off an
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00178.html (9,758 bytes)

3. RE: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: TOM KOCH <tom.koch@a...>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 23:10:38 -0500
Hopefully BNSF will stay steam friendly long enough for some group to restore a Q steamer. Doesn't that sound too good to be true??? An occasional MLW or for that matter even UP steamer on the Q main
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00179.html (8,118 bytes)

4. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: Aeolus3@a...
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 02:39:12 EDT
261 is a beautiful engine! The only thing that would be nicer would be an O5 steaming up the C&I <G> Loren Johnson
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00180.html (7,827 bytes)

5. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: Stan Maddox <slm007@m...>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 17:02:10 -0500
Y'all, I also enjoyed seeing 261. I was lucky enough to catch her both days, the first by pure luck. I was returning from a family shindig Saturday, and just happened to be "in the right place at the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00183.html (12,679 bytes)

6. RE: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: JACK5008@w...
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 23:25:18 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Tom, It would be great for a group to restore a Q steamer and for BNSF to be friendly to the idea. I myself would love to see shovelnose Zephyrs and Chinese red GP-20's running in excursion servic
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00185.html (10,305 bytes)

7. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: Ed Pavlovic <epav1@w...>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 23:07:04 -0500
The comments about the GP20's reminds me of one time chasing the 261 up around Neenah, WI. We were waiting for the train to catch up to us and the friend that I was with mentioned to some of the othe
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00186.html (8,946 bytes)

8. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: bkroger@e...
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 23:15:37 -0500
The equipment is out there if BNSF wants to use it. Ask IRM about their relationship with BNSF, which can only be described as fantastic. IRM has apparently proven to BNSF that they are good and appr
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00187.html (9,384 bytes)

9. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: JACK5008@w...
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 01:02:30 -0400 (EDT)
Ed, We all have our favorites. I like all railroad equipment, but like some more than others. I have 4 favorite railroads: Erie New York Central System Burlington Route Western Pacific Being from the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00188.html (8,807 bytes)

10. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: BNJohn@a...
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 01:22:18 EDT
Jack, Last year Dave Lotz and I talked to the BNSF in regard to just repainting two of there loco's for the Q's anniversary, we wanted to have them in Chicago for the BRHS fall meet after that they c
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00190.html (11,803 bytes)

11. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@c...>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 22:57:25 -0700
3003 is in Burlington the IRM has 3007. and I would love to see it run also. Ken Martin
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00191.html (8,470 bytes)

12. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: marshall <zephyr03@s...>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 06:41:07 -0500
It looks like somebody should dig out the news-magazine interview with L. W. Menk from around 25 years ago. He was whining about the general public (hence the shippers) lacking awareness of the Burli
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00192.html (10,223 bytes)

13. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: vlbg <vlbg@s...>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 08:03:33 -0500
John: If it makes any difference there is some internal resistance to painting BNSF locomotives as a waste of resources and an unnecessary removal of a unit from service. Russ
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00194.html (12,524 bytes)

14. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: BNJohn@a...
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 11:51:30 EDT
BNSF Russ, At the time we talk to the BNSF I was told that they were going to repaint 300 loco's that year, so the loco's would have been out of service anyway. Also I had my friend at DuPont talked
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00195.html (8,279 bytes)

15. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: atsf3460@a...
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 12:35:45 EDT
Interesting comments about Mr. Krebs and Frisco #1522 from John Lee. If Mr. Krebs did feel that way about the steam locomotive (wanting to cut it up on the spot) then I wonder why #1522 is scheduled
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00198.html (8,306 bytes)

16. Re: [BRHSlist] Milwaukee 261at Oregon, IL (score: 1)
Author: vlbg <vlbg@s...>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 18:26:40 -0500
John: For what it's worth the time would still have be paid for. BNSF has never painted a locomotive. It is all contracted out since they do not have a an approved paint shop. Both BN and ATSF quit p
/archives/BRHSLIST/2000-05/msg00199.html (9,111 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu