Mail Archive Search: <+from:jonathanharris@e...>

Results:

References: [ +from:jonathanharris@e...: 93 ]

Total 93 documents matching your query.

1. Re: VIRUS ON THE LIST (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 10:41:18 -0900; I agree it seems unlikely, probably even impossible, for a virus attachment to come through a yahoo list. But there's clearly some connection -- even if indirect -- to the BRHSlist, which we should t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00012.html (7,550 bytes)
2. Re: NKP PA-14 kits (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 13:34:16 -0600; Thanks for the update, Mike. Does this mean that my October 5 check will be cashed and a kit sent to me or that I missed the sold-out first run? Jonathan evening. The FIRST run in instruction do some; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00017.html (9,013 bytes)
3. Re: NKP PA-14 kits (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 17:33:21 -0600; Mike -- PS: In light of the current virus problem, please respond to my last post ON-list only. Until we get this thing licked, and/or until I get a good version of Norton installed, I'd like to mini; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00022.html (9,773 bytes)
4. A few unexpected prototype models (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:00:06 -0900; This post is especially for Lines West modelers and Jeff Worones or whoever is maintaining or updating the BRHS inventory of prototype models. This past summer I picked up a copy of GRANGER COUNTRY,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00128.html (7,980 bytes)
5. Re: Last regular use of mainline steam (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 08:42:05 -0900; I think Warren is correct. I recall seeing a photo -- maybe in TRAINS, maybe a newspaper -- of 4960 pulling a Zephyr (California, I believe) through high waters on some floodplain, though I can't rem; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00162.html (7,026 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] FW: Genesis CB&Q 2-8-2 (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 09:39:26 -0900; Gee, I kinda like my Kato NW2. Gotta lose that Scotchlite striping, though. Yuck! --jh Regarding Q mikes -- patience. Sooner or later someone will bring out a decent-running, well-detailed heavy USR; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00210.html (9,472 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] FW: Genesis CB&Q 2-8-2 (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 12:43:32 -0900; Tom -- I wouldn't worry too much about more "basic" designs being forced out. So long as modelers demand and are willing support such models, I think it's fairly safe to say manuafactures will contin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-12/msg00215.html (10,712 bytes)
8. RE: [BRHSlist] Say What?! (was: proto 2000 GP7s) (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 11:53:03 -0900; The question no one is asking is, how could P2K have gotten it so wrong? They've done excellent work in the past, and their earlier release of SD7s had a very good light gray on top. Water over the d; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00007.html (10,229 bytes)
9. The Blackbird Scheme (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 22:52:45 -0900; The ongoing discussions about painting our blackbirds and the dates for changeover to Chinese red reminded me of a question I've been curious about for some time: When did the Blackbird scheme itself; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00019.html (6,877 bytes)
10. Yard Switcher/Doodlebug Paint Scheme Development (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:24:13 -0900; Ed and others, No doubt you're right that the hood unit paint scheme must have been derived from the earlier switcher scheme. I'm sorry if my question was unclear. I was wondering when and how the "b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00024.html (8,916 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] Blackbird Scheme on P2K locos (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 07:06:58 -0900; Loren's points are right on target. Paint chips are great references and invaluable starting points for the development of model railroad colors. But if we try to paint our models to match these chip; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00038.html (8,506 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: K-2 Loco (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 11:15:47 -0900; Other potential bash-ees I've wondered about are the Model Power ten wheelers (and consolidations) -- if for no other reason than their spoked pilot wheels and pedistal tender trucks. Does anybody, A; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00133.html (10,598 bytes)
13. Re: [BRHSlist] UP Archives (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 15:38:45 -0900; Sometime in the mid to late 1940s,the CB&Q donated a vast collection of its pre-1901 historical documents to the Newberry Library in Chicago (over 1,000,000 items occupying 1,800' of shelf space). So; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00146.html (7,240 bytes)
14. NKP PA-14 kits (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:40:55 -0900; Back in early October (right after receiving my latest Bulletin, with all those enclosed ad flyers), I ordered a kit of one of the PA-14 suburban coaches from NKP Car Company. These were supposed to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00302.html (6,858 bytes)
15. Re: [BRHSlist] Commercial Postings on BRHSlist (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:12:35 -0900; Dave and List -- Thanks for taking this poll. I'm all in favor of polls and of majority rule, but a little more clarification and maybe some discussion/debate might help us make a better decision. (I; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00310.html (10,860 bytes)
16. Re: [BRHSlist] the book "STATIONS" (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:37:37 -0900; Well, I saw it "remaindered" in the Walthers catalogue a few years ago, which is generally not a good sign (it's like in those old "Godzilla" movies, when they abruptly switch from using a real train; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00322.html (7,818 bytes)
17. Re: [BRHSlist] Amtrak Speed Limits (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 13:34:09 -0800; Tim's point is well taken but needs at least a little qualification in an era of welded rail, light-weight equipment, and all the other refinements that make today's trains much quieter than their pr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-10/msg00038.html (9,974 bytes)
18. Re: [BRHSlist] Photo Site Worth Visiting (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:29:06 -0800; At first I thought it was an auxiliary air tank (several RRs had air tanks in exactly that configuration), but the more closely I look the more I wonder. First of all, why would they need an extra a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-10/msg00118.html (7,637 bytes)
19. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Dreaming of Q R-5, R-5A and P-6A models (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:59:50 -0800; Uh huh. ... You heard anything serious? Are we really any closer? These things have been promised for ... what? 3-4 years now? I thought they all fell into the turntable pit at Lincoln and were scra; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-10/msg00138.html (6,747 bytes)
20. Re: [BRHSlist] CB&Q Book (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@e...; Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 12:00:53 -0800; Florian -- My interest is also fairly early, though I am not a purist and am willing to include some plausible looking equipment from the early-mid '50s in my roster (I draw the line at Chinese red o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-10/msg00146.html (8,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]