- 1. RE: [CBQ] Q Stewart HO Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:19:14 -0800
- Winter project - I'm getting ready to paint & finish several ABA and ABBA sets of the earlier run Stewart HO F units for my CB&Q grayback livery. I know that Kadee makes their #450 couplers specifica
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-01/msg00048.html (10,741 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] Instructions for Walthers CB&Q Waycars? (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas \(G2\)" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 18:23:01 -0700
- Folks, One of my friends has sent home a half dozen of the above waycars for me to build and finish for him. 1) Would someone have a copy of those instructions they could scan and send along? 2) The
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-05/msg00141.html (10,598 bytes)
- 3. RE: [CBQ] BRHS Vitality (Action Item) (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas \(G2\)" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:10:27 -0700
- "The GN's last convention in Minneapolis/St. Paul was in 2001. They are already slated for Glacier Park, Montana, for 2010." GNRHS tentatively plans convention locations a couple-three years in advan
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00244.html (13,385 bytes)
- 4. RE: [CBQ] HO scale model need (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 18:10:49 -0700
- John commented in part: <<I have an IHC ore car whose RP 25 contour wheels simply do not like Shinohara turnouts. They want to take the diverging route every time. All other models negotiate the swit
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-11/msg00039.html (11,291 bytes)
- 5. RE: [CBQ] Drop Steps On Diesels (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 19:10:43 -0700
- <<I'll assume these were "standard" appliances on EMD loco's, but one would think they could have saved a few bucks by having EMD delete them.>> When it comes to removing standard items from a basic
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-08/msg00079.html (10,595 bytes)
- 6. [CBQ] Minot, ND Hump Yard - was Fourth Main (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 11:06:10 -0800
- Bill Barber commented in part: <<Of course, this isn't the only corporate mistake made by the Hill Lines. There was a hump yard built at Minot, ND, I believe, that was never used for it's intended pu
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00067.html (12,290 bytes)
- 7. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:05:38 -0800
- Bill responds: <<The yard in Minot, ND is Gavin Yard on the Great Northern. The yard was not fully used to its maximum potential.>> I've never heard this statement made before with respect to Gavin d
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00071.html (14,107 bytes)
- 8. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 22:04:42 -0800
- Cy Svobodny comments on GN's Gavin yard: <<Maybe as a GN facility it was ok, but, I had a private tour in the early 70's and a group tour again in the mid 70's. Both times it looked like a third to
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00078.html (13,010 bytes)
- 9. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:41:27 -0800
- Chuck Hatler comments: <<I did note that the tail track ended. You could not access the hump from the east. You could only pull a string of cars out of the yard, up the hump, and then start pushing b
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00099.html (15,701 bytes)
- 10. RE: [CBQ] Re:Minot, ND Hump Yard - was Fourth Main (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:50:10 -0800
- Hi Bill, "First, let me preface my comments by saying that I do not follow the GN nor to I know a lot about their activities except as they may have influenced the Q." A mirror image of my interests
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00100.html (12,513 bytes)
- 11. [CBQ] RE: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:48:46 -0700
- <<Steve, and Friends of the Q, Just a little late in replying. Steve, glad you proofread better than I type. Yes, the tail end was on the WEST end. My error. Thanks, Chuck Hatler KC MO>> Not to worry
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00144.html (12,281 bytes)
- 12. RE: [CBQ] Re: Steam loco generator on EMD switcher? (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:32:07 -0700
- <<Avast reports this link as a threat. and so does Malwarebytes the spam and malware detection software I use.Post the picture as a clean and clear item in the photo section if you want folks to see
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-07/msg00266.html (11,354 bytes)
- 13. RE: [CBQ] Re: Pool Power with GN & NP (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:01:22 -0700
- <<Would you have seen GN or NP F units coming into Chicago?>> I can't speak to the NP units, but the GN color pictorials have quite a few shots if GN F units on the Q on freight. There are also some
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00346.html (11,513 bytes)
- 14. RE: [CBQ] Re: Pool Power with GN & NP (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:51:06 -0700
- <<Just for clarification the FW&D is the Fort Worth & Denver not the Fort Worth and Dallas. There were GN FT(s) leased in the 1960(s)>> Rodney is absolutely correct – my mistake. Sorry for the
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00351.html (14,474 bytes)
- 15. RE: [CBQ] re: BN GP 20s (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:07:39 -0800
- << It was 5 Q units and 5 GN units. Some of the GN units started out as FT units from what I've seen. >> GN FT units were traded in on some of the GP20’s. While some components from the FT̵
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-01/msg00016.html (13,592 bytes)
- 16. RE: [CBQ] Re: BN GP 20s (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 11:42:43 -0800
- Bill Barber expands on my comments: <<The car bodies and frame structure of the "F" model locomotives was unusable on GP type locomotives. The "F" carbody was sort of a bridge structure. The frame wa
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-01/msg00020.html (18,788 bytes)
- 17. RE: [CBQ] Re: 1956 Empty stock cars eastbound (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 21:46:09 -0800
- <<WARNING The email from Paul Kossart contains a virus of some sort. Do not open the link to tinyurl. I went to the blue screen of death after clicking on the link. Mike Cafferata>> BZZZZZZZTTTTTTTT!
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-12/msg00161.html (12,436 bytes)
- 18. RE: [CBQ] Re: Some photos from Passenger Car Photo Index (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 10:57:38 -0800
- Bill, There’s an extra ‘.’ on the end of the html address – try the link without it. Best regards, Steve Haas Snoqualmie , WA John, The link says the web page does not exist.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-02/msg00031.html (15,269 bytes)
- 19. RE: [CBQ] Diesel operation (score: 1)
- Author: "'Steve Haas' Goatfisher2@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:27:53 -0800
- <<I admit I am not the most knowledgable about diesel operation on mainline trains. In mainline usage how many "motors" were typically used on a train? What got me thinking is I recently got two of t
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-11/msg00205.html (11,865 bytes)
- 20. RE: [CBQ] On the Road Again... (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 18:26:50 -0800
- The entire configuration as others have said is for the inspection of cars, usually just before the roll over the hump. The two sloped windows at the bottom of the buildings and the sloped windows be
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-02/msg00014.html (11,668 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu