Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Question\s+on\s+Rule\s+501I\s+\-\s+Permissive\s+Signal\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Mack via Groups.Io" <thommack=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 06:21:34 -0700
Hopefully a ex-CB&Q employee can help me with this one. Rule 501I (501"eye") was a permissive signal - "Proceed at restricted speed through entire block". It was either a red signal with a milepost n
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00088.html (12,471 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "zephyr98072" <glenehaug@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 21:32:59 +0000
Tom: Can you send me the photo, or at least describe which direction it is facing, and if you know if the photo is before or after Savanna Tower was removed. I am not familiar with this particular si
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00091.html (15,055 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 09:30:39 -0700
Huh? The 2 are completely different. The 501E Approach only requires that you be prepared to stop at the NEXT signal. The block is clear from the 501E Approach signal to the next signal. You may pro
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00093.html (11,660 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 09:38:42 -0700
I am not familiar with exactly how the CB&Q interlocking or CTC signals electrically worked... but I suspect the lunar 'call on' Permissive light might have been automatic. That is if the dispatcher
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00094.html (11,221 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "zephyr98072" <glenehaug@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 02:37:54 +0000
Tom: After looking at the photo, I didn't realize until now that this eastward signal had a lunar associated with it. I looked at a CB&Q alignment chart from 1967, and discovered that the eastward si
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00097.html (17,258 bytes)

6. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 20:51:24 -0700
I think you mis-typed the above? If the Interlocking was NOT lined then only the red light would be lit, no lunar. You can't pass thru the interlocking, even at Restricted Speed, if the interlocking
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00098.html (11,361 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "zephyr98072" <glenehaug@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 06:42:52 +0000
Sorry, I meant to say 'not lined up against you', i.e. lined for the Milwaukee. Glen Haug From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> on behalf of Winton <runextra@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 8:5
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00099.html (13,792 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Mack via Groups.Io" <thommack=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 03:56:17 -0700
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#57310) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nau
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00100.html (12,606 bytes)

9. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Brandon Otterstrom via Groups.Io" <brandono13=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 09:57:15 -0700
Mr Mack, Would you be willing to share the photograph of this signal with me. I am a signal technician on the C&I and have never seen a photo of a Q signal displaying this aspect. I can say that at E
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00102.html (12,471 bytes)

10. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "jpslhedgpeth via Groups.Io" <jpslhedgpeth=aol.com@groups.io>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 15:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
Tom Your paragraph 2 explains what happened at Naperville on April 25, 1946 Pete _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#57322) | Reply To Group Mu
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00112.html (13,007 bytes)

11. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 11:21:24 -0700
In my 1967 rulebook in the Burlington Lines section Rule 501i Permissive says "Proceed at restricted speed through entire block". You then have to look at the rulebook definition of Restricted Speed
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00116.html (12,648 bytes)

12. Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 11:21:24 -0700
[Edited Message Follows] In my 1967 rulebook in the Burlington Lines section Rule 501i Permissive says "Proceed at restricted speed through entire block". You then have to look at the rulebook defini
/archives/BRHSLIST/2019-05/msg00117.html (12,668 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu