To: | CBQ@groups.io |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal |
From: | "Winton" <runextra@gmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 16 May 2019 20:51:24 -0700 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@groups.io |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1558065095; bh=LGzz0Kh/7oSrb1IbjxmlgTaPIkwZW/j41+nwY/7Bm9s=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=QOJEQJW9YjL6KYgIT0HsA/nYzijnRYK/dO6th9Jh15VPZtWtFi4TB/Ap6vNxEJABs+6 IiGEFOE/7bAwLB/5hSQKRpwPFUx8s7noEMR/s/EtB+gpDihX5M47gHdXREhgi6ehyk4dl lo45prekRsTeYHreAPuQqjmrq2UI6xNnYuw= |
In-reply-to: | <DM5PR17MB122628D1825136B6900C0823BB0B0@DM5PR17MB1226.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.groups.io> |
List-unsubscribe: | <https://groups.io/g/CBQ/unsub> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io |
References: | <DM5PR17MB122628D1825136B6900C0823BB0B0@DM5PR17MB1226.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@groups.io |
Sender: | CBQ@groups.io |
User-agent: | GROUPS.IO Web Poster |
> The red searchlight with lunar lit would be displayed if the interlocking was > not occupied (and not lined up), but the intermediate block was occupied. I think you mis-typed the above? If the Interlocking was NOT lined then only the red light would be lit, no lunar. You can't pass thru the interlocking, even at Restricted Speed, if the interlocking is not lined for your movement. The red with lunar means the interlocking is lined but the block is occupied or hand throw switch not lined for main, etc. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#57308): https://groups.io/g/CBQ/message/57308 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31629594/703214 Group Owner: CBQ+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/691670059/xyzzy [archives@nauer.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal, zephyr98072 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal, zephyr98072 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal, zephyr98072 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Question on Rule 501I - Permissive Signal, zephyr98072 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |