- 21. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "Louis Zadnichek via groups.io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
- February 24, 2021 Charlie - Bill Barber is the "keeper" of CB&Q Fan Trip fliers now (or shortly will be) posted to the BRHS Flickr Gallery. He ought to be able to ID that particular Hudson-powered fa
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00214.html (15,292 bytes)
- 22. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "Louis Zadnichek via groups.io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:27:04 +0000 (UTC)
- February 24, 2021 Bill - Many THANKS for going to all the trouble of researching and sharing the BRHS Flickr images of Class G-5 or G-5-A 0-6-0's used at NWS&W as mill switchers. I was not previously
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00215.html (16,102 bytes)
- 23. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "HOL WAGNER" <holpennywagner@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:04:37 +0000
- Bear in mind that the G-5-A USRA copies have Q style sand domes, not the flat-top domes of the original G-5s, so it's easy to tell which ones became NWS&W 503 and 509; it was clearly G-5s 503 and 509
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00219.html (17,572 bytes)
- 24. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "Leo Phillipp via groups.io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:24:50 -0600
- Bear in mind that the G-5-A USRA copies have Q style sand domes, not the flat-top domes of the original G-5s, so it's easy to tell which ones became NWS&W 503 and 509; it was clearly G-5s 503 and 50
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00223.html (16,360 bytes)
- 25. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "William Barber" <clipperw@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:52:58 -0600
- Charlie, Your inspection of the scrapyard bound 2-8-2s had to occur between 1956 and 1958. There were five fan trips powered by hudsons during that period. They are as follows: 1956 07/01 4000 Chicag
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00225.html (11,082 bytes)
- 26. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "little-q@att.net" <trains@davidstreeter.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:55:00 -0600
- Do these photos exist with higher resolution than you attached? I noticed on the first one that the number plate on the smokebox door quite obviously is indeed 504 with the 5 and 0 painted out, but t
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00226.html (13,831 bytes)
- 27. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:41:01 -0600
- BillThe Aeoli were deshrouded before I was born on Oct 12 1945. I think we can rule out 1958 because I think I was in Wisconsin as a new boy at St Johns MA in Delafield, WI late Aug early Sep. The th
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00231.html (11,614 bytes)
- 28. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "William Barber" <clipperw@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:33:51 -0600
- David, I had to reduce the resolution in order to email four photos on one group. However, the original resolution that we have available for each photo is generally not a great deal better. I have l
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00232.html (10,300 bytes)
- 29. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "Louis Zadnichek via groups.io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:22:31 +0000 (UTC)
- February 25, 2021 Leo - Since steam power was long gone by the time of the BN merger, I'll speculate Mr. Keck was an ex-Q employee and somehow was connected to Galesburg where the Q's remaining steam
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00235.html (19,321 bytes)
- 30. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1)
- Author: "Louis Zadnichek via groups.io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC)
- February 25, 2021 Charlie - The Q disposed of its Class M-2-A 2-10-2 types in 1953 and 1954, so they would've been gone by that time. Some of the Class O-3 2-8-2 types lasted into 1956-1957, so maybe
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00237.html (18,293 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu