- 1. Re: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: PSHedgpeth@a...
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:46:10 EDT
- Paul and list Here's what my old memory tells me regarding some of your questions. My operating days go back to 1950's and early 60's before a lot of the changes were made, but I'll be glad to stand
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00134.html (8,550 bytes)
- 2. Re: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: PSHedgpeth@a...
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:59:31 EDT
- Paul and list Forgot "shorts and propers". A "short" is a car destined for someplace between the initial and final terminal for a train. ie A "short" for a Chicago Galesburg train would be for any to
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00135.html (7,806 bytes)
- 3. RE: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Mitchell" <tmitchell@c...>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:04:07 -0400
- I think TOFC is "trailer on flatcar" (Piggyback). It seems to me if the flatcar had capacity for two semi-trailers and it was loaded with just one trailer, you didn't want the trailer on the front of
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00137.html (9,597 bytes)
- 4. Re: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:04:48 -0500
- Paul, If the train you are talking about is "CD" A & C Mixed just means that the D&RGW had three blocking groups and they did not care at that particular time if the A's and C's were mixed. You may a
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00138.html (9,190 bytes)
- 5. Re: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:42:54 -0500
- Tom, Perhaps to clarify, the correct way to load one trailer on a two stanchion flat is with the wheels towards the middle of the car. More of the trailer weight rests on the wheels than on the stanc
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00139.html (8,394 bytes)
- 6. Re: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 13:41:54 -0500
- At 06:00 PM 8/16/02, you wrote: paul, stupid idea here probably, but how about employee timetables from the division you want to emulate. they came out twice a year. how about timetables from say, 19
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00152.html (8,679 bytes)
- 7. Re: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 14:03:00 -0500
- Here's what my old memory tells me regarding some of your questions. My operating days go back to 1950's and early 60's before a lot of the changes were made, but I'll be glad to stand corrected. PH
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00153.html (11,035 bytes)
- 8. Re: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 14:51:09 -0500
- If the train you are talking about is "CD" A & C Mixed just means that the D&RGW had three blocking groups and they did not care at that particular time if the A's and C's were mixed. You may ask wh
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00154.html (12,169 bytes)
- 9. Re: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 09:28:20 -0500
- Region - were Paul, All freights between Chicago and Galesburg were run as extras at least as far back as the earliest timetable I have which would be 1939. The times in the operating data sheets we
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00156.html (8,335 bytes)
- 10. Re: [BRHSlist] Questions On Terms (score: 1)
- Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@p...>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 09:28:20 -0500
- Region - were Paul, All freights between Chicago and Galesburg were run as extras at least as far back as the earliest timetable I have which would be 1939. The times in the operating data sheets we
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00157.html (8,304 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu