Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Locals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Locals\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 23:50:34 EST; << Does anyone know the whereabouts of a photo of trains 45/52 (the local between C.U.S. and Savanna or info.on the typical consist? >> Leo, During the time period I am modeling, (1950) these trains; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00054.html (7,494 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Ed Pavlovic <epav1@w...>; Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 23:41:06 -0600; Leo, Can't answer the photo question, but I can help out with the consists somewhat. At the Prototype Modelers show in Naperville this past October, there was a clinic put on by Jim Miller on RPO ope; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00055.html (8,385 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 20:49:15 EST; << For comparison, the Blackhawk, 47& 48 each had 3 engines, 4 headend, and 10 passenger cars listed. >> Ed and list, At this time (1959) the Blackhawk was combined with the Western Star and the remn; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00064.html (8,032 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <PIXELS@A...>; Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 09:05:12 -0600; Leo, Rich, Ed and others: Trains 45 and 52 were discontinued in segments. The Savanna - Minneapolis runs were discontinued on 9-29-58. On 7-18-59, those trains made the last Chicago - Savanna trips.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00069.html (7,506 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 18:01:04 EST; << Photos of geeps on Galesburg locals 2 and 15 have also also been published. I have slides of both Black and Red GP's on the Galesburg Local. I bought them from Dick Wallin. Interesting train to mo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00070.html (7,405 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Ed Pavlovic <epav1@w...>; Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 20:19:04 -0600; Considering the fact that a GP7 without cab signals might possibly be assigned, what was the Q's policy towards operating passenger trains without cab signal equipped units. Just asking because the C; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00072.html (7,443 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: " JOHN J. OLSON & DEBBIE NIESS" <trains@m...>; Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 20:41:53 -0700; Not to mention the fact that it was also 90 MPH territory. I'll bet the GP-7's were hard pressed to make time with passenger trains on that segment of track and those traction motors must have really; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00073.html (8,722 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:35:15 EST; << Not to mention the fact that it was also 90 MPH territory. I'll bet the GP-7's were hard pressed to make time with passenger trains on that segment of track and those traction motors must have rea; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00074.html (7,966 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: "Karl L Rethwisch" <karlre@r...>; Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:20:00 -0700; I believe all Q GP7's and 9's were equipped with the 62:15 gear ratio which would limit the maximm, SAFE speed to 70 MPH. 51 and 52, as well as 47 and 48, ran on schedules calling for 75 MPH top spee; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00076.html (8,820 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Wes Leatherock <wleath@s...>; Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:34:55 -0600 (CST); Is it legal to run locomotives without cab signals as the controlling engine in cab signal territory? Isn't the 90 mph speed limits based on the idea that ALL trains will be equipped with cab signals; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00077.html (9,365 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <PIXELS@A...>; Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 12:14:40 -0600; Loren: Don't overlook the fact that the E units had different gear ratios than the geeps. The fact that an E unit also had 500 to 750 more horses under the hood may have also contributed to the acce; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00080.html (8,247 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <PIXELS@A...>; Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 12:15:05 -0600; Considering the fact that a GP7 without cab signals might possibly be assigned, what was the Q's policy towards operating passenger trains without cab signal equipped units. Just asking because the C; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00081.html (7,584 bytes)
13. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <PIXELS@A...>; Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 12:15:05 -0600; John: The GP7's, as well as other geeps and SD's of that generation had 65 mph gearing. I suspect if they even approached 90,the traction motor armatures would be in the process of uncoiling........; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00082.html (8,288 bytes)
14. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: "Karl L Rethwisch" <karlre@r...>; Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:30:10 -0700; A requirement allowing 90 and 100 MPH speeds was two, separeate signal systems; wayside and cab signals. Class 5 track allowed 90 while class 6 was required for 100 MPH. None of the Q's freight engin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00084.html (10,302 bytes)
15. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Ron Burkhard <ronburk@M...>; Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 21:19:05 -0600; I know that EMD and ALCO, GE, and I suspect Baldwin and others had over speed sensors that would shut down the prime mover to either idle or set the brakes, or both, depending on the manufacturer, or; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00088.html (8,993 bytes)
16. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: " JOHN J. OLSON & DEBBIE NIESS" <trains@m...>; Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 20:33:50 -0700; Ed & group, I knew 65 mph was about the max for all the Q's locomotives except for the E's and the SD-45's- but I'll bet the engineers had the GP's pushed right up to the thresh-hold when they were u; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00089.html (10,307 bytes)
17. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:13:17 EST; << Loren: Don't overlook the fact that the E units had different gear ratios than the geeps. The fact that an E unit also had 500 to 750 more horses under the hood may have also contributed to the ac; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00090.html (7,656 bytes)
18. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: hold-on@s...; Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 23:40:03 -0800; The mainline crews would crawl down into the nose and turn on the cab signals on up units on arriving at the west end of Aurora. That was until the mid '80s when BN decided they could not use them. A; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00091.html (11,792 bytes)
19. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: hogger41@a...; Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:02:45 EST; Karl, They were geared for 70MPH. What speed did they usually go? Gary O.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00105.html (7,089 bytes)
20. Re: [BRHSlist] Locals (score: 1): Author: hold-on@s...; Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 23:26:46 -0800; Gary It depended which end of the run Hot Rod Harding was at. SJH -- -- Click here for Free Video!! http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-12/msg00106.html (7,650 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]