Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+BRHS\s+2002\s+Calendar\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+BRHS\s+2002\s+Calendar\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>; Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 23:21:45 -0600; To all BRHS members: The calendars have arrived in St. Louis...will be stuffed into the envelopes tomorrow and depending upon how long it takes them, they may go into the mail yet tomorrow afternoon,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00042.html (7,272 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>; Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 17:07:58 -0600; Hi, Not to make waves but . . . Daring to ask the obvious, I have always wondered why the calendar for the new year cannot be sent to reach all members . . . _before_ the new year. Just a crazy thoug; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00050.html (8,890 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: Bryan Howell <tubaman21@y...>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:41:08 -0800 (PST); Not to sound like a smart-alec, but it seems to me that that is why the 2001 calender includes a January 2002.:-) Bryan Howell tubaman21@y... http://www.angelfire.com/il2/burlingtonzephyrs ~~~~~~~~~~; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00051.html (10,146 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 18:44:10 EST; The calendar was done early. The annual report took longer than expected, thus it is lateas we save postage by mailing them together. Are you volunteering to spearhead this effort next year? Just a c; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00052.html (7,993 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:04:52 EST; That's one of the deep, imponderable mysteries of life. Don't worry about it....be glad we get one. Pete [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00053.html (7,651 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 22:21:26 -0600; The calendar was done early. The annual report took longer than expected, thus it is lateas we save postage by mailing them together. Are you volunteering to spearhead this effort next year? Hell no; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00097.html (8,957 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 06:19:06 EST; Paul, I have no problems with legitimate questions and in no way am trying to "shame" these away. I do, however, have a problem with sarcasm directed at the people who are doing the work. Rich Gortow; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00106.html (8,532 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: Ralph Brown <cbq682@g...>; Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 07:32:54 -0600; I like my calendar. . .a lot! I try not to keep track of when things from the BRHS should arrive. This way when it does arrive, its kind of a surprise. Like the last Burlington Bulletin. I sure wasn; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00107.html (8,686 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:51:46 EST; Rich and list, The "V" word is exact... Volunteer! No one involved in the publications of the BRHS receives any pay. Not Hol, not Mike, not Dave, not Ed, and not the host of others involved in puttin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00108.html (10,343 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: drale99@a...; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:08:02 EST; I guess it "takes all kinds". As for me, I have no complaints and wish to commend the individuals who keep BRHS going and do the job they are doing to get us all superior materials and info. I contin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00110.html (8,587 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: tim fleck <tf5077@y...>; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 15:40:37 -0800 (PST); __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00114.html (9,316 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:35:36 -0600; Paul, I have no problems with legitimate questions and in no way am trying to "shame" these away. I do, however, have a problem with sarcasm directed at the people who are doing the work. Rich Gorto; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00130.html (8,910 bytes)
13. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: "twhitt" <twhitt@p...>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:09:47 -0600; Rich, Not only is it sarcasm, but with a hint of arrogance. As one who has volunteered and been involved since the Society's conception, I can only make one observation... I do not recall Mr. Kossart; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00132.html (9,468 bytes)
14. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: Ralph Brown <cbq682@g...>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:40:52 -0600; Now, now, everyone. Let's put the calendar issue to rest. If we forget about the calendar, it will be a surprise when it arrives. Just remember to thank those volunteers the next you converse or corr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00133.html (8,449 bytes)
15. RE: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: "Myers, Scott V." <svmyers@s...>; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:13:49 -0600; I second that motion. I'm sure the initial comment wasn't said to disparage the efforts of any volunteers, and Paul's last email struck me as an olive branch held out to those who may have taken offe; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00134.html (9,427 bytes)
16. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: drale99@a...; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:53:12 EST; Thanks for telling us about the Jan, 02 page. It's a beauty! That's the 7000 -- my favorite old Burlington engine. The B1a was the biggest passenger locomotive out of Ravenna back in the 30's and ear; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00135.html (7,799 bytes)
17. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:38:29 EST; I have been to Ravenna although it was in the past few years under of course BN and then BNSF. From what I saw I bet it was a grand railroad town back in the Q days! [Non-text portions of this messag; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00138.html (7,788 bytes)
18. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS 2002 Calendar (score: 1): Author: drale99@a...; Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 21:14:28 EST; Ravenna was a unique place. It was a division point on the St. Louis-Billings line, which was a busy line in the 30s and 40s. The town had a population of only about 1800, many of whom were railroade; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00143.html (8,806 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]