Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+10\-6\s+Sleepers\s+and\s+Zephyr\s+questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+10\-6\s+Sleepers\s+and\s+Zephyr\s+questions\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 06:25:50 EST; Rick, Here are the names of those 6 Pullman's, Silver Dale (ARZ), Silver Isle (Blackhawk), Silver Medow (Blackhawk), Silver Plain (Blackhawk), Silver Prairie (Blackhawk), and Silver Slope (ARZ). Silv; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00072.html (8,254 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Levine" <sjl@p...>; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 07:37:00 -0600; Loren I believe the Silver Slope was lettered for the CZ. sjl Stephen and Linda Levine steveandlindaare@h... If trains were just for kids...we wouldn't wanna grow up! Rick, Here are the names of thos; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00073.html (9,237 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 09:36:08 EST; While Loren has a great answer here, like every consist, it fluctuated over time. For example, in 1950, the year I model, the American Royal had not yet acheived Zephyr status and was (likely) runnin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00074.html (9,543 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: "Rick Keil" <rkeil6721@h...>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 09:00:55 -0600; Thanks for the answers so far. So the way I read this, only the California, Denver, Morning/Afternoon, and Nebraska Zephyrs were the only "all lightweight" trains the Q ran. That being said, and unde; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00075.html (11,408 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 10:40:19 EST; Rick, Nothing I know of come remotely close to an SSS car in plastic. Your best bet is to use one of the Walthers SS coaches as a stand-in. Head-end are also a problem. Don't forget, head end does no; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00076.html (8,566 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 10:52:37 EST; Again, depends on when. When introduced the KCZ was all stainless. It then suffered from many substitutions of silver painted heavyweights (including the grotesquely painted NCL obs the Q owned). Aft; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00077.html (8,874 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: atsf3460@a...; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:20:00 EST; Rich is exactly right on his critique of the paint job on this car. What a horrible paint job for such a beautiful car. I can't think of what the Q should have painted it other than silver though! Ma; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00078.html (8,405 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: Ken martin <kmartin@c...>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 12:38:55 -0700; There is also the Rivarossi bagg-mail which is close to the Q 1900's, also there were 8100 series 40' box express cars converted from XM-32 boxcars. Also if you look at the consist sheets in the last; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00080.html (9,156 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:47:56 EST; Unfortunately, most of these only lasted until 1949 and I believe they were all back in box service by 1951. Rich [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00084.html (8,297 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:52:30 EST; Stephen, According to Wayner, Car Names Numbers and Consists, Silver Slope was lettered for "Burlington". Wayner lists Silver Crag and Silver Chasm as the "CZ" cars. Loren [Non-text portions of this; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00085.html (8,252 bytes)
11. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: "Rick Keil" <rkeil6721@h...>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 16:55:38 -0600; Now that my interest in the SSS chair cars has been ignited. One could conceivably take the upcoming Branchline Trains coach (22 windows, spacing a bit off) and the roof from a Havelock baggage car k; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00086.html (10,160 bytes)
12. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 18:08:41 EST; Rick, Con Cor (ducking here guys) but Con Cor makes a very nice smooth side 72 foot baggage car. It comes painted in both Northern Pacific (very nice) and Great Northern of which I have not seen one; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00087.html (9,096 bytes)
13. RE: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 07:55:10 -0600; The roofs are part of the Eastern Car Works Core Kit. Dave Now that my interest in the SSS chair cars has been ignited. One could conceivably take the upcoming Branchline Trains coach (22 windows, sp; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00091.html (10,973 bytes)
14. Re: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:29:16 EST; Rick, I don't think this car will work for the SSS Rebuild. Owing to the windows, it appears in the photos on the Branchline Web Site, the wondows on the coach not the sealed windows the Aurora Shops; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00093.html (8,909 bytes)
15. RE: [BRHSlist] 10-6 Sleepers and Zephyr questions (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <charlie@k...>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:25:03 -0600; The paint job wasn't necessarily the problem....removing the skirts without any apologies made the car UGLY, not the silver paint (which worked well enough on the ex-C&NW 400 coaches). Charlie; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00094.html (10,271 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]