Mail Archive Search: <+from:19main@groundcontrol.us>

Results:

References: [ +from:19main@groundcontrol.us: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CBQ] Q Operations Question (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:17:41 -0500; Tom, Would almost always be a new car. Would always be on different waybills. If the Customer kept the car they would have to pay demurrage on it. That would be just money wasted. The scenario you pr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00078.html (14,731 bytes)
42. Re: [CBQ] Q Operations Question (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:47:10 -0500; John, I have to disagree. The Transit Billing system did not allow for a car to arrive at a Customer and leave on the same billing. That concept would only apply to stop-offs and all they would allow; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00083.html (12,984 bytes)
43. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q VO-1000s (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 07:58:05 -0500; Mike, As to this being done at West Burlington I would not be too sure. During the WWII era each shop was quite self sufficient. I have records of the full length stacks being applied to the early NW; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00099.html (11,972 bytes)
44. Re: [CBQ] VO 1000's (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:23:54 -0500; Brad, Some of the CB&Q GE trade ins went to Precision National which in turn sold them to the ACL/SCL where they were in service for another 4 or 5 years. A couple of this group ended up in the Phosp; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00105.html (10,889 bytes)
45. Re: [CBQ] Reefers Question (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:25:47 -0500; Paul, Greetings, I have another question concerning road names in a consist, this time concerning reefers in a Burlington freight train. Era is 1960's. Would there be any PFE or SFRD cars in any numb; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00109.html (11,769 bytes)
46. Re: [CBQ] Baldwin #35 (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:33:39 -0500; Roger, Have shots of the East End way freight with that engine in their train switching at Westmont IL while I was working as Agent there. Has to be '66 or '67. The Patee House Museum bills the locom; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00118.html (12,090 bytes)
47. Re: [CBQ] Reefers Question (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:13:50 -0500; Paul, You really got me lost now. That consist includes 54 reefers in a row. Isn't that a "very large block"? Any Midwestern road of that era would have considered this as a pretty good train. It pro; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00137.html (12,321 bytes)
48. Re: [CBQ] Re: Q Operations Question (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:43:55 -0500; Tom, Switching charges: Industry does not pay anything for spotting a car or pulling it out when released. That is part of the service. Only charges that might be assessed would be if the car is prop; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00138.html (14,260 bytes)
49. [CBQ] CB&Q Operations (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:18:07 -0500; All, Three deliveries from the IHB to CB&Q at Congress Park, 1959. At that time there was a requirement that the billing road be shown on records for all waybilled cars. What is shown is what was rec; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00153.html (15,987 bytes)
50. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Operations (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:00:31 -0500; Eric, That is the most obvious and almost certainly the correct analysis. These Customers were still in existence when I started working and it was the same pattern. Russ, This is great stuff. Since; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00155.html (12,010 bytes)
51. Re: [CBQ] Reefers Question (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:52:59 -0500; Paul, Take this in steps: 1. AT&SF was the only major road that seldom if ever pooled cars with other roads. While with diversions and shipper's selection of routings you may see a car here and there; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00160.html (17,201 bytes)
52. Re: [CBQ] Digest Number 2504 (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:51:13 -0500; Bill, This was the way things were handled in 1959. depending on what year you are talking about, terminated at either South Omaha or Council Bluffs. It was not a Lincoln train. In 1959, to the best; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00166.html (14,671 bytes)
53. Re: [CBQ] Council Bluffs Info Wanted (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:10:14 -0500; Tom, Questions 1 thru 4 no answer. Know nothing about the operation of these trains. Question 5. Most of the time they did not. Stock car usage was seasonal and might require large numbers of cars th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00167.html (12,198 bytes)
54. Re: [CBQ] Reefers Question (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:37:33 -0500; Paul, Then how about another list. This is not primarily a meat train. It is also in a season where fruit and vegetable movements were usually very light. In this case the list covers the entire trai; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00171.html (14,710 bytes)
55. [CBQ] A Bit Of Trivia (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:43:11 -0500; All, In late 1970 BN ordered 600 100ton covered hoppers from Gunderson that were assigned lot 17313. The actual numbers ordered were: BN 455250-456649 = 400 cars C&S 50000-50199 = 200 cars Before the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00194.html (9,004 bytes)
56. Re: [CBQ] Denrock Sub and around the horn (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:00:42 -0500; Tom, Denrock to Mendota through Walnut. had nothing but tonnage. Unit Potash trains usually went via Denrock. That is why the re-billing point was set up as Mendota. In 1967/68 when trains ran "aroun; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00203.html (10,999 bytes)
57. Re: [CBQ] CX reporting marks (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:57:11 -0500; Denny, Didn't know they did. Does anyone know the date that C&S began to use CX as its reporting mark- a burning question on the Steam Era Freight Car List? Denny -- Denny S. Anspach, MD Sacramento,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00208.html (10,023 bytes)
58. Re: [CBQ] Denrock Sub and around the horn - Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:51:39 -0500; Tom, You lost me many times with these train numbers. Have no idea where they came from. The "Map" you are referring to is so bad it's of almost no use. This is PR Department stuff. 1. Yard engines f; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00212.html (14,881 bytes)
59. [CBQ] Old Maintenance Of Way Equipment (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:14:42 -0500; All, Have tracked down the car that is with the undercutter in the Chicago area. BN 965559 = BNFE 5102, Now at Eola. There was also: BN 965560 = BNFE 5172, Condemned, no current location. BN 966026 =; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-07/msg00055.html (9,031 bytes)
60. Re: [CBQ] Burlington passenger cars (score: 1): Author: Russell Strodtz <19main@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:22:18 -0500; Jim, BNSF has a fairly large fleet of passenger equipment. Is used for special trains and as mobile offices. There is a school of thought in Railroad Marketing that one way to impress a Customer on t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-07/msg00163.html (10,390 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]