|
Thank you for the suggestion. This change has been made to the rosters on the BRHS website.
Bryan J. Howell From: "Gordon Smith kc2bw@optonline.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 11:43 AM Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Intermountain F3 Issue Just a suggestion Bryan...add the former
numbers to the 163 to 166B & C notes column Gordon -------- Original Message -------- > > > Bob, > > Where on the BRHS website are you > seeing this error? I have checked both > places we have the information, which > can be found in the links below, and > it is correct. BB#4 was the primary > source for the information on the > F-units. There were some discrepancies > in the information when I took over > the page some time ago and I use > Burlington in Transition and the Holck > books, which agreed with each other, > on all roster data. The information > Nelson showed may be from before I > made those corrections about 8 years > ago. Please let me know if I have > missed something. > > Burlington Route Historical Society > <http://www.burlingtonroute.com/docs/rosters/droster_f3.html> > http://www.burlingtonroute.com/docs/rosters/diesel.html > > > > > <http://www.burlingtonroute.com/docs/rosters/droster_f3.html> > Bryan J. Howell > > > ---------------------------------------- > *From:* "amtrak347@aol.com [CBQ]" > <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> > *To:* CBQ@yahoogroups.com > *Sent:* Saturday, September 24, 2016 > 2:57 AM > *Subject:* Re: [CBQ] Re: Intermountain > F3 Issue > > Komanesky(sp) & Van Derveer doesn't > even list a 166C. Funny, no one has > mentioned "Burlington in Transition" > as a source of information regarding > 166C. BiT, X2200S #29 and BB#4 > (BRHS's own publication) are correct > and prove the website is wrong. Both > 138D and 166C have the same EMD > builder's number, 7013, per the three > sources mentioned. Brian H. needs to > make the correction. > > Bob Campbell > > > > > __._,_.___ Posted by: Bryan Howell <tubaman21@yahoo.com> __,_._,___ |