Just a suggestion Bryan...add
the former
numbers to the 163 to 166B & C notes column
Gordon
--------
Original Message --------
>
>
> Bob,
>
> Where on the BRHS
website are you
> seeing this error? I have checked both
> places we have the information, which
> can
be found in the links below, and
> it is correct. BB#4 was
the primary
> source for the information on the
> F-units. There were some discrepancies
> in
the information when I took over
> the page some time ago
and I use
> Burlington in Transition and the Holck
> books, which agreed with each other,
> on
all roster data. The information
> Nelson showed may be from
before I
> made those corrections about 8 years
> ago. Please let me know if I have
> missed
something.
>
> Burlington Route Historical
Society
>
<http://www.burlingtonroute.com/docs/rosters/droster_f3.html>
> http://www.burlingtonroute.com/docs/rosters/diesel.html
>
>
>
>
>
<http://www.burlingtonroute.com/docs/rosters/droster_f3.html>
> Bryan J. Howell
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
*From:* "amtrak347@aol.com [CBQ]"
>
<CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
> *To:* CBQ@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 24, 2016
> 2:57
AM
> *Subject:* Re: [CBQ] Re: Intermountain
> F3 Issue
>
> Komanesky(sp)
& Van Derveer doesn't
> even list a 166C. Funny, no one
has
> mentioned "Burlington in Transition"
> as a source of information regarding
> 166C.
BiT, X2200S #29 and BB#4
> (BRHS's own publication) are
correct
> and prove the website is wrong. Both
> 138D and 166C have the same EMD
> builder's
number, 7013, per the three
> sources mentioned. Brian H.
needs to
> make the correction.
>
> Bob Campbell
>
>
>
>
>