Re: [CBQ] Re: Intermountain F3 Issue

["RWA325@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>]

I stand corrected.  My assumption was, since it was in print on the roster,  that it was "listed".  Had I not knee-jerked my way into the conversation I would have realized that "ain't no way" you guys would not have known about something so obvious.  Thanks for not shaming me too badly.  ;-)

 

Bob A 

 

In a message dated 9/24/2016 11:48:44 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, CBQ@yahoogroups.com writes:

 

> Yes it is in the notes fore the
> 138...And if you look further down the
> list where the 163A to 166A and 163B
> to 166B are listed, they do not show
> the 163C to 166C.
>
> Gordon
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>>
>>
>> Gordon,
>> 166C is in the Notes column for 138D.
>> Bob Arthur
>> In a message dated 9/24/2016 7:27:21
>> A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> CBQ@yahoogroups.com writes:
>>
>> What correction? The units are
>> one in
>> the same. Renumbered from 138D to
>> 166C
>> in 1955. And yes the 166C is missing
>> from The Diesel Shop roster.
>>
>> Gordon
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> >
>> >
>> > Komanesky(sp) & Van Derveer
>> doesn't
>> > even list a 166C. Funny, no one
>> has
>> > mentioned "Burlington in
>> Transition"
>> > as a source of information
>> regarding
>> > 166C. BiT, X2200S #29 and BB#4
>> > (BRHS's own publication) are
>> correct
>> > and prove the website is wrong.
>> Both
>> > 138D and 166C have the same EMD
>> > builder's number, 7013, per the
>> three
>> > sources mentioned. Brian H.
>> needs to
>> > make the correction.
>> >
>> > Bob Campbell
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

__._,_.___

---

Posted by: RWA325@aol.com

---

Visit Your Group

• New Members 1

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___