To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Re: Water Cooled Journal Box Bearings |
From: | "qmp211" <milepost206@mchsi.com> |
Date: | Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:21:51 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1365445312; bh=KhAjK9nHisjlPI5+zHCuBwwZz1eTpQgQLD8wlHXQnG4=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4Jln0QxnwjoOyNsIE/cKc6a6Gjsv5QLlwgeIFOOTzCln+qnmu9ErKImDVvadwSmBpKOtyfyClSx0/oqN9ew7v05CeaYlvOloLgtjYn180AZ+KUwFpJVaiA9ORQ1wl8x+QufwuOGFBm/DZGYqBSRjqK6NMLkulOrQSymEJOmgabg= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=ycqIUiXWn36F39SgIm6SvRLsAjMvs2RPVS8/4oTSiB76PYl0z5JuaHFfOgw5NMbHNKxWVxmfuvYMjd15xEsAiAGUaf7bfqWvDShQysaamErYIbCYw2FKEUQCe/EoG3Xn72FlpQJzWjlL6LLZqrVZDFGBxHM/+V6A7bcqhwOWeqI=; |
In-reply-to: | <d583b.3f4285c9.3e930f17@aol.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
Even with the premise surrounding the employee's duty to protect company property, I am not convinced water cooling for hot journal boxes was a standard practice. And since the history of the engine found at the link appears to be written by someone other than Baldwin, I would like to hear more about these water lines. Limping an engine to a terminal is a lot different investment/safety consideration than the conventional hotbox. Any other photos of this arrangement on other engines would be helpful along with any Baldwin info on theory and practice. As for the long tender deck, many builder photos were hand retouched from other images. I would suggest that this builder card MIGHT have reflected a long deck as delivered. But I tend to believe this was a possible revision in process for a longer tender and then redrawn to the as-built length or just a mistake. The builders and railroads bounced around many ideas for changes in the builder's card format. Anyway, that's my 2¢. Randy ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CBQ] Bob Stanage estate, Gerald Edgar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CBQ] St. Paul Union Depot, the book by John Diers, Chuck Hatler |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Re: Water Cooled Journal Box Bearings, dieselpop1 |
Next by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Re: Water Cooled Journal Box Bearings, HOL WAGNER |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |