Re: [CBQ] Double Heading Steam

["Russ Strodtz" <normansen@groundcontrol.us>]

That was not a rule by the IHB. Had no radios at all so that was the
only moves that could be used. Radio agreement did not happen until
Engineers got it in 1977. Even then many still did everything by air,
it was safer that radio. That's the way I did it.

Russ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ralph W. Brown, Jr." <cbq682@grics.net>
To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 17 June, 2009 22:43
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Double Heading Steam



Reading about the use of the air brakes as a signal reminded me of something an 
old head engineer told me.  Back before the crews had packsets, they would go 
south of Galesburg to the coal fields.  I was told one of the locations 
involved switch moves where visibility was obstructed.  So the crew would crack 
open the anglecock on the last car.  The engineer would be watching the gauge 
for a drop in pressure.  That was a signal to stop.  When the switchman wanted 
the train to move again, he would crack the air again.  This would go on in 
forward/reverse fashion until the work was complete.  That too would be a big 
no-no in today’s railroad, although very clever.

 

R.W. Brown, Jr.

Galesburg, IL




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/