Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Tracks\s+at\s+Quincy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Tracks\s+at\s+Quincy\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: bsrls@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:55:02 -0600; Larry, Thanks for your response. You confirm what I was already thinking particularly in regards to the what the required grade would have been. The only elevation data that I have is from USGS Topo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00142.html (15,824 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: Larry Stoll <larry.stoll@cbqrr.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:54:31 -0500; I have produced a map of the West Quincy - Quincy area showing the routing of the Zephyr-Rocket through Quincy for inclusion in the next Terminal Railroad of St. Louis Historical and Technical Socie; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00144.html (18,775 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: bsrls@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:55:02 -0600; Ken, Thanks for the reference. I will try to find a copy of that article as it sounds interesting. Those old trade magazines often had some very good detailed articles. 'Railway and Engineering Revie; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00145.html (13,426 bytes)
4. [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: bsrls@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:55:02 -0600; Thanks Larry. A few days will be fine. Bill -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditiona; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00146.html (18,211 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:52:54 -0400 (EDT); Phil Weibler is really your "go to guy" on this matter..Maybe he will come on and enlighten you guys. It does seem to me that I recall seeing an article in TRAINS sometime shortly after the new West; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00147.html (20,191 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:31:31 -0700 (PDT); Kalmbach put out a Burlington photo album in the late 40's or early 50's showing the Quincy yards with a Q passenger train behind E-5's coming off of the old bridge and showing the "bay" bridge. BTW,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00150.html (14,907 bytes)
7. [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: bsrls@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:55:02 -0600; John, Thanks for sending the reference to the Trains articles. I should be able to find them. Best, Bill -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/grou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00157.html (13,004 bytes)
8. [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: bsrls@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:55:02 -0600; Dave, Thanks for posting the five maps from the Track Chart Book. They show quite a bit of additional information that my track charts from the west side of the river don't show. I can now get a bett; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00158.html (11,258 bytes)
9. RE: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:05:57 -0700; Bill: I found a track chart from 1956 that shows from MP 260 to West Quincy, via the 1947 connection track and the original route across the river. I will try to scan it tomorrow and post it to the s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00161.html (13,101 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:04:28 -0400; That might have been the Zephyr Rocket. It was still crossing over to Illinois until the early fifties. What other trains might it have been? Duncan Cameron -- Original Message -- From: cbqrr47@yahoo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00164.html (14,971 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:35:56 -0700 (PDT); That might have been the Zephyr Rocket. It was still crossing over to Illinois until the early fifties. What other trains might it have been? Duncan Cameron -- Original Message -- From: cbqrr47@yaho; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00166.html (17,095 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:36:05 -0400 (EDT); Duncan, Per the caption, it's the detouring Exposition Flyer, due to a wash-out on the main. The book was copyrighted in 1947. It's a very nice, large photo of the train coming off of the bridge. Ric; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00167.html (16,103 bytes)
13. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:39:53 -0400 (EDT); I forgot to mention - an 11 car train with one express box on the head and one pre-war stainless car in the middle. The rest of the cars are heavyweight. Rich G. Duncan, Per the caption, it's the det; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00168.html (17,275 bytes)
14. RE: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:56:49 -0400; John, Im interested to know why you feel this is not the Expo, or at least a section of the Expo. Ive always accepted the caption, and here are my reasons: the pair of E5s on the head end an express; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00169.html (20,167 bytes)
15. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: ralph linroth <wcman8@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT); Dave, Thanks for posting the five maps from the Track Chart Book. They show quite a bit of additional information that my track charts from the west side of the river don't show. I can now get a bet; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00172.html (12,794 bytes)
16. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:11:10 -0700 (PDT); John, Im interested to know why you feel this is not the Expo, or at least a section of the Expo. Ive always accepted the caption, and here are my reasons: the pair of E5s on the head end an express; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00174.html (21,103 bytes)
17. Re: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: Philip Weibler <pawnbaw@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT); Phil Weibler is really your "go to guy" on this matter..Maybe he will come on and enlighten you guys. It does seem to me that I recall seeing an article in TRAINS sometime shortly after the new West; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00177.html (16,818 bytes)
18. RE: [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:02:45 -0400; Hi John, I had always just accepted the caption for the photo as being accurate, but then, I know that captions are not always correct. Thats why I asked if you had some information that I was not a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00178.html (17,168 bytes)
19. [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: bsrls@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:55:01 -0600; Glen, I look forward to seeing your 1956 track chart. All of the track charts I either have or have seen, have been from the mid 1960's. It will be good to see a pre new bridge track chart. If you ha; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00180.html (13,141 bytes)
20. [CBQ] Re: Tracks at Quincy (score: 1): Author: bsrls@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:55:01 -0600; List, I have posted in the files section a portion of a 1938 aerial photo of similar area to what Dave just recently posted. It is: "Aerial Quincy-Carthage Jct. 1938.PDF" and it is in the file folder; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00181.html (12,589 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]