- 1. [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:17:09 -0600
- Re: The angle of the slant? "Charlie Vlk" n_cbqguy Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:38 pm (PST) . Posted by: Brian and Charlie, Keep in mind that the E5 carbody design really came from the slightly earlier E3 and
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00313.html (16,454 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: "Dale Reeves" <drale99@roadrunner.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:28:50 -0500
- I have always understood that the E5 was intentionally designed to mimic the PZ, not only the nose but also the fluting and other aspects. The painted grill is an obvious takeoff, as well as the heig
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00314.html (13,649 bytes)
- 3. [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: John Willis <willisjc@zebra.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:59:46 -0600
- This subject was a recent subject in Classic Trains. I think it was the issue just prior to the current one. I would look it up and quote which issue, but I'm in Maryland and those issues are in Mobi
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00316.html (11,182 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:44:10 -0600
- OMG, make it go away!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you kindly, Michael Matalis Downers Grove IL You can see my railroad photography blog at http://www.chasingheavymetal.com/blog/ You can see my photos and my ugl
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00318.html (21,459 bytes)
- 5. [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: Randy Gordon-Gilmore <randy@prototrains.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:13:50 -0600
- By my "measurement" (folded piece of notebook paper recording the angle between the nose apex and top of the anticlimber) the nose angle of the 1st generation shovelnoses (PZ, Flying Yankee, MTZ)powe
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00319.html (11,820 bytes)
- 6. [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: "dieselpop1" <dieselpop1@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:55:02 -0600
- That'll make ya wanna poke your mind's eye out. W. D. Hoy -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Emai
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00320.html (12,601 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: John Manion <railbass@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:54:41 -0700
- [Attachment(s) from HOL WAGNER included below] And don't forget that original design drawings for the E5 show it as a shovelnose. And then there was the gawdawful version seen in the attached ren
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00321.html (17,187 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: Stephen Levine <sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:32:37 -0800 (PST)
- Actually, the design of the E6 originated with the EAs delivered to the Baltimore and Ohio, although the design of the locomotives delivered to the UP for passenger trains, such as the City of Denver
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00323.html (17,136 bytes)
- 9. [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: Randal O'Toole <rot@ti.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:11:55 -0800
- Just to be clear: The shovel nose locomotives were designed by Budd; the E units were designed by EMD. So they were not designed by the same engineer(s), unless someone defected from Budd to EMD. Bur
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00324.html (12,034 bytes)
- 10. RE: [CBQ] Re: The angle of the slant? (score: 1)
- Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:45:48 -0600
- The EMD Demo Unit, which ran on the CB&Q, had the recessed headlight of the EA units. Before it was sold to the KCS it was reworked with the “protruding headlight”. The E5 Bulletin had ph
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00325.html (12,852 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu