Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Oregon\s+Part\s+Two\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Oregon\s+Part\s+Two\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: herrick@krausonline.com; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:55:01 -0600; Leo, The ETT I have is dated January 31, 1954 and it lists (as information only) three west-bound numbered freights and two east-bound. At that time 83 was the daily except Saturday Rockford and Sava; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00278.html (13,219 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:49:50 -0600; Leo, The ETT I have is dated January 31, 1954 and it lists (as information only) three west-bound numbered freights and two east-bound. At that time 83 was the daily except Saturday Rockford and Sav; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00279.html (15,608 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: herrick@krausonline.com; Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:55:01 -0600; Leo, I see the reference to PU in the '62 ETT--the eyes skipped right over it. Thanks. One other question about your OS sheets--do they indicate the power on the Oregon Turn? A late photo in Spoor's; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00288.html (15,899 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:20:09 -0500 (EST); Bob, I dont believe the TRs ever got assigned to the Aurora Div. The one reference to OT I can find shows the 2824 coming in on the job from main 1 to west yard and then the scale trk at 6:05PM on 6/; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00289.html (9,568 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:13:37 -0800 (PST); Leo, I see the reference to PU in the '62 ETT--the eyes skipped right over it. Thanks. One other question about your OS sheets--do they indicate the power on the Oregon Turn? A late photo in Spoor's; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00292.html (17,632 bytes)
6. [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: "pal_houston" <paulaleonard08@att.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:55:01 -0600; Leo: if the Oregon switch engine was there for a month or more, between traks to Cicero for maintenance, what was done about fueling it in Oregon? Did the Q have a contract with a local fuel dealer,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00076.html (11,995 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:30:44 -0800 (PST); The Q had tank cars but they were in company service and were not used for interchange service so they weren't listed in the ORER. -- On Fri, 1/4/13, pal_houston <paulaleonard08@att.net> wrote: From:; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00077.html (13,333 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:37:41 -0500 (EST); Paul, Remote engines were fueled by local bulk dealers under contract. The engine would be placed in a spot where the dealers truck could get access. At Oregon it was on the "River trk",some called i; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00078.html (12,620 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:56:26 -0800 (PST); There were also earler tank cars in the 23xxxx series. -- On Fri, 1/4/13, qutlx1@aol.com <qutlx1@aol.com> wrote: From: qutlx1@aol.com <qutlx1@aol.com> Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two To: CBQ@y; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00082.html (13,499 bytes)
10. [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: "ryan_gash" <rpgash28@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:55:01 -0600; You'll also see BN tank cars and old BNFT fuel tenders there. Ryan Gash -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: I; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00087.html (10,978 bytes)
11. [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: herrick@krausonline.com; Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:55:02 -0600; Leo, Can you supply more information about the 18,100 series company service tank cars for diesel fuel? The photos in Mike Spoor's book show cars in the 23,000 series as did the two mini-articles in; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00126.html (12,566 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 12:30:15 -0800 (PST); I'm not sure but,I think CB&Q 18100 series cars are class XM-32 boxcars. Maybe he meant BN numbers. -- On Sat, 1/5/13, herrick@krausonline.com <herrick@krausonline.com> wrote: From: herrick@krausonli; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00127.html (14,245 bytes)
13. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oregon Part Two (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:59:23 -0600; I'm not sure but,I think CB&Q 18100 series cars are class XM-32 boxcars. Maybe he meant BN numbers. -- On Sat, 1/5/13, herrick@krausonline.com <herrick@krausonline.com> wrote: From: herrick@krausonl; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00132.html (15,652 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]