- 1. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:55:16 -0600
- All Thanks for the many replies. Some various follow-ups... McGee and MtHS. Yep, when WRM disclosed his intention to donate, there was a lot of comment and help from NPRHA members about how-to, etc.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-12/msg00021.html (16,711 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillips, III, J.A." <whstlpnk@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 00:39:08 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- All Thanks for the many replies. Some various follow-ups... McGee and MtHS. Yep, when WRM disclosed his intention to donate, there was a lot of comment and help from NPRHA members about how-to, etc.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00001.html (14,399 bytes)
- 3. [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: Kenneth Martin <kmartin537@surewest.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:19:44 -0700
- Nothing in the Bulletin but there was a Data Sheet on the TM-3 tank cars (10,000 gal, High walkways) 15000-15106 renumbered renumbered 230000-23016 in 1936. Ken Martin On Nov 1, 2013, at 12:39 AM, Ph
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00002.html (13,106 bytes)
- 4. RE: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: Rick Keil <rkeil6721@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:40:01 -0500
- mailto:whstlpnk@ix.netcom.com?subject=Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two "Phillips, III, J.A." whstlpnk Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:21 pm (PDT) . Posted by: All Were there ever any issues with the tank cars l
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00003.html (25,215 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:09:45 -0500
- All Thanks for the many replies. Some various follow-ups... McGee and MtHS. Yep, when WRM disclosed his intention to donate, there was a lot of comment and help from NPRHA members about how-to, etc.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00004.html (17,149 bytes)
- 6. RE: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:19:28 -0600
- And there were certainly no environmental concerns about leaking oil. In fact, a bit further back in time, around the turn of the 20th Century, many railroads -- the Q and C&S among them -- widely pr
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00005.html (18,100 bytes)
- 7. [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: "Douglas Harding" <doug.harding@iowacentralrr.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:42:55 -0600
- John Sinclair has a large refinery at Casper http://www.sinclairoil.com/casper_refinery.html which dates from 1923. A quick Google search for oil refineries in Wyoming also shows refineries at: Cheye
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00025.html (13,699 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: Chris Atkins <tcatkins@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:28:20 -0600
- Husky had a refinery in Cody from 1938 until 1982. http://www.wyohistory.org/encyclopedia/cody-wyoming There is also a Cenex refinery on the south side Laurel, which I like to think of as the Q line
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00029.html (15,501 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: Norm Metcalf <normmetcalf@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 06:53:55 -0700
- The Sinclair refinery at Casper is ex-Texaco. The Evansville refinery is ex-Mobil. Amoco also had a refinery at Casper (now razed), its loco is now at the Colorado RR Museum. The refinery at Cody is
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00034.html (15,887 bytes)
- 10. RE: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 13:49:34 -0700
- And in the Q era the Amoco refinery at Casper was a property of Standard Oil. Hol From: normmetcalf@yahoo.com To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 06:53:55 -0700 Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Oil o
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00038.html (14,685 bytes)
- 11. [CBQ] RE: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: <runextra@gmail.com>
- Date: 07 Nov 2013 14:53:00 -0800
- __._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscr
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00056.html (15,581 bytes)
- 12. Re: [CBQ] RE: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: LZadnichek@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 19:46:24 -0500 (EST)
- November 7, 2013 Q 4-8-4s were never assigned to the Casper Div. as far as I know. Might've been tenders off Q 4-8-2s or tenders with extended water tanks such as were coupled to 2-8-2s and 2-10-2s.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00058.html (17,053 bytes)
- 13. [CBQ] RE: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: <mdecker@gwtc.net>
- Date: 08 Nov 2013 06:32:17 -0800
- November 7, 2013 Q 4-8-4s were never assigned to the Casper Div. as far as I know. Might've been tenders off Q 4-8-2s or tenders with extended water tanks such as were coupled to 2-8-2s and 2-10-2s.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00063.html (18,069 bytes)
- 14. Re: [CBQ] RE: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: William Jackson <macon249@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:02:47 -0500
- November 7, 2013 Q 4-8-4s were never assigned to the Casper Div. as far as I know. Might've been tenders off Q 4-8-2s or tenders with extended water tanks such as were coupled to 2-8-2s and 2-10-2s.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00064.html (19,081 bytes)
- 15. [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: "mdude47@frontier.com" <mdude47@frontier.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 19:55:01 -0600
- (I hope this does not get posted twice) Diesel fuel and ammonium nitrate, ANFO, is no big deal unless it is in a confined space with a booster, primer cord and cap in it. It takes a real good jolt to
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00069.html (14,793 bytes)
- 16. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:54:34 -0800 (PST)
- ANFO is classed as a "blasting agent" not an "explosive" because a #6 electric blasting cap will not set it off. John Mitchell, mining engineer. From: "mdude47@frontier.com" <mdude47@frontier.com> To
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00070.html (17,315 bytes)
- 17. Re: [CBQ] RE: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: William Jackson <macon249@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 14:45:07 -0500
- November 7, 2013 Q 4-8-4s were never assigned to the Casper Div. as far as I know. Might've been tenders off Q 4-8-2s or tenders with extended water tanks such as were coupled to 2-8-2s and 2-10-2s.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00072.html (20,232 bytes)
- 18. [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:58:13 -0500
- Oil on the Q in World War Two "Phillips, III, J.A." whstlpnk Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:21 pm (PDT) . Posted by: __._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switc
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00151.html (16,415 bytes)
- 19. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:14:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Oil on the Q in World War Two "Phillips, III, J.A." whstlpnk Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:21 pm (PDT) . Posted by: Bill et al I think that the photo you are referrencing is in that oversize photo album..maybe
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00154.html (16,930 bytes)
- 20. Re: [CBQ] Re: Oil on the Q in World War Two (score: 1)
- Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
- Oil on the Q in World War Two "Phillips, III, J.A." whstlpnk Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:21 pm (PDT) . Posted by: Well believe it or not I was wrong about what I remembered....I went down and found the album
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00156.html (18,552 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu