Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+CB\&Q\s+signals\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "Walter Ohrnell wohrnell@kc.rr.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:06:42 -0600
Nelson, Mount Union still had TO signal in August 1958. Lenny Ohrnell Sent from my iPad -- Yahoo Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your em
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00130.html (10,901 bytes)

2. RE: [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer npmoyer@hotmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:20:01 +0000
But did they have an operator? Stations could have a train order signal that was non-operational because there was no operator/agent. Besides, what would be the purpose of hiring an operator/agent wh
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00131.html (13,353 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Hirt whirt@fastmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:04:28 -0600
On the Burlington and Washington Subdivision, Mount Union was listed as an open office from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday-Friday in the Ottumwa and Creston Division Employee Timetable 84 effective April
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00132.html (14,422 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:35:27 -0500
I always relate my "stuff" to my trainman days on the Lincoln and Wymore Divisions in 1956-58. Working the Fairmon Hildreth branch summer 1958 there were several open stations on the line with operat
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00136.html (15,929 bytes)

5. RE: [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer npmoyer@hotmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:54:51 +0000
Thanks for the clarification, Bill. Employee Timetables for the early 1950s are hard to find. Mediapolis was Rock Island territory, and the start of Q track on the Branch, so I would think the operat
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00137.html (16,430 bytes)

6. Re: [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Hirt whirt@fastmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:14:43 -0600
Nelson, The 1960 CB&Q track chart shows the division of ownership at RI milepost 15.38 and CB&Q milepost 15.51. This is just north of Mediapolis. The only depot shown at that time is the Rock Island
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00139.html (16,383 bytes)

7. [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "apo09324@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 21 Jan 2017 00:02:32 -0800
Ten years ago, I worked for an abstract company in Des Moines County. One project I once worked on was searching properties on both sides of Hwy 61 from the north Burlington city limits to the Louisa
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00144.html (14,991 bytes)

8. [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "Walter Ohrnell wohrnell@kc.rr.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 07:49:34 -0600
Nelson, Yes, there was A/O at that location. Lenny Ohrnell Sent from my iPad -- Yahoo Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email setting
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00145.html (11,296 bytes)

9. [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "'Douglas Harding' doug.harding@iowacentralrr.org [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 07:57:39 -0600
Ken, Iowa law voids reversion clauses, unless the owner renewed the reversion clause, ie updated the deed, within the last 21 years. There is an exemption for abandoned railway property. https://www.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00146.html (13,865 bytes)

10. RE: [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "Nelson Moyer npmoyer@hotmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:48:11 +0000
According to Bill Hirt's email in this thread, there was an A/O in Mt. Union in 1954 but not in 1957. I believe the date you originally cited for the presence of train order signals was 1958, so in 1
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00148.html (13,654 bytes)

11. [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "apo09324@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 21 Jan 2017 18:13:13 -0800
Doug, it has been a long time since I have seen them, but I believe most railroad deeds were General Deeds. If I recall correctly, the deed for the land by the gypsum plant switch was a Warranty Deed
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00151.html (14,374 bytes)

12. [CBQ] Re: CB&Q signals (score: 1)
Author: "Walter Ohrnell wohrnell@kc.rr.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:36:20 -0600
Nelson, I concur with Bill's response, they were closed as TO stations only. I relieved the A/O at Mt. Union and Yarmouth during the Spring of 64. The TO signals had been removed by that time. It was
/archives/BRHSLIST/2017-01/msg00154.html (11,254 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu