Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RE\:\s+Minot\,\s+ND\s+Hump\s+Yard\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RE\:\s+Minot\,\s+ND\s+Hump\s+Yard\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: "CY" <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:16:48 -0600; The yard in Minot, ND is Gavin Yard on the Great Northern. The yard was not fully used to its maximum potential. I heard reports that is has been returned to a flat yard of a smaller size. I had tour; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00069.html (10,878 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:05:38 -0800; Bill responds: <<The yard in Minot, ND is Gavin Yard on the Great Northern. The yard was not fully used to its maximum potential.>> I've never heard this statement made before with respect to Gavin d; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00071.html (14,107 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: Cy Svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 18:19:50 -0800 (PST); Maybe as a GN facility it was ok, but, I had a private tour in the early 70's and a group tour again in the mid 70's. Both times it looked like a third to half the bowl tracks were empty .And the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00075.html (14,301 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 22:04:42 -0800; Cy Svobodny comments on GN's Gavin yard: <<Maybe as a GN facility it was ok, but, I had a private tour in the early 70's and a group tour again in the mid 70's. Both times it looked like a third to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00078.html (13,010 bytes)
5. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: Frederick Ripley <fjr68@live.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 07:48:29 -0600; List, Pre-merger, was there any regular run-through of CB&Q/GN power through the Twin Cities? If so, it would seem Gavin would have been the logicalturn-around point for any CB&Q power that made it o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00080.html (12,970 bytes)
6. [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Hatler" <gnhistory07@live.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:25:40 -0600; One of the jobs that Gavin performed was holding grain loads while the grades were shipped to the grain exchange in Minneapolis. Once the grades were established, and the grain sold, then Gavin had t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00087.html (11,025 bytes)
7. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: ROBERT K SORENSEN <rksmes@q.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 16:15:00 -0600; Chuck- I worked at a Malting Company in Minneapolis in the mid 60's. What was sent to the Grain Exchange was samples taken in the holding yards. Lots of the barley cars were held at a yard in Dilwort; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00091.html (12,453 bytes)
8. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: ROBERT K SORENSEN <rksmes@q.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 16:15:42 -0600; Chuck- I worked at a Malting Company in Minneapolis in the mid 60's. What was sent to the Grain Exchange was samples taken in the holding yards. Lots of the barley cars were held at a yard in Dilwort; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00092.html (12,447 bytes)
9. [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:27:58 -0600; Chuck, As I read through the various posts on the issue of Gavin Yard's viability and purpose, I think the basis for my comment had more to do with the construction of the hump there, not the existen; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00097.html (12,915 bytes)
10. [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Hatler" <gnhistory07@live.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:15:00 -0600; Bill, Thanks for clarifying what your source of information is on Gavin. In its fully operational day, I recall going past on a passenger train and just being wowed at the sight of that really long t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00098.html (11,241 bytes)
11. RE: [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:41:27 -0800; Chuck Hatler comments: <<I did note that the tail track ended. You could not access the hump from the east. You could only pull a string of cars out of the yard, up the hump, and then start pushing b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00099.html (15,701 bytes)
12. [CBQ] Re: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Hatler" <gnhistory07@live.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:45:37 -0500; Steve, and Friends of the Q, Just a little late in replying. Steve, glad you proofread better than I type. Yes, the tail end was on the WEST end. My error. Thanks, Chuck Hatler KC MO [Non-text portio; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00143.html (10,783 bytes)
13. [CBQ] RE: Minot, ND Hump Yard (score: 1): Author: "Steve Haas" <Goatfisher2@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:48:46 -0700; <<Steve, and Friends of the Q, Just a little late in replying. Steve, glad you proofread better than I type. Yes, the tail end was on the WEST end. My error. Thanks, Chuck Hatler KC MO>> Not to worry; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00144.html (12,281 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]