Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+New\s+Pullman\s+Cars\s+Comparison\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+New\s+Pullman\s+Cars\s+Comparison\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Myers, Scott V." <svmyers@southernco.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:26:09 -0600; With both Branchline and Walthers now producing the Pullman cars, what are people's thoughts as to the pros and cons of each. I am interested in obtaining these cars and see that the list price is si; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00002.html (9,913 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: "John Trulson" <norskeviking@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:59:55 -0800; I've seen both and I like both. I believe you'll end up buying both as they each have cars the other doesn't .For the ones they both have, I'd by Walther's. John Trulson -- Original Message -- From:; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00013.html (10,815 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <zephyr1@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 22:57:10 -0600; With the Walthers cars, you will have to take the effort to ensure that the paint scheme and trucks (and other details) are accurate for the car. That isn't the case with the Branchline models. Walth; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00014.html (13,421 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <zephyr1@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 03:35:56 -0600; One thing I failed to mention - Walthers has the superior interior (though has crappy "glass), and the body is difficult t o disassemble). BTW, they are doing at least 4 of the same cars, which is re; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00017.html (14,713 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: "harold huber" <sarge9@bresnan.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 08:33:39 -0700; Branch line probably is more detailed and care is needed to construct, Walthers is a shake the box. Agree with John seen both and they are well needed addition, but I'm going with the Branchline if a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00018.html (11,958 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: cy svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:37:46 -0800 (PST); __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00023.html (11,239 bytes)
7. RE: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Kai Solvei" <YahooGroups@solvei.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:17:56 +0100; So does anyone know which of the Walthers cars are correct for the CB&Q? Or if the 12-1 sleeper is correct as it is the only one released yet? Kai Solvei With the Walthers cars, you will have to take; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00027.html (10,862 bytes)
8. RE: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: "Myers, Scott V." <svmyers@southernco.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:59:30 -0600; Your reference to the availability of many of the same cars from both suppliers is what prompted my initial inquiry to the list. By the way, I meant to also ask if those who have cars from both suppl; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00041.html (16,350 bytes)
9. RE: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <zephyr1@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 08:44:49 -0600; They will (look compatible) - except you will have to modify the trucks (and likely the windows) of the Walthers cars. The trucks (and the subsequent height issue) is a problem on the Walthers cars.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00042.html (19,675 bytes)
10. RE: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <zephyr1@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 08:49:50 -0600; I should also point out though, as I did in my other post - they will look compatible - except the Walthers cars won't have the detail - especially the underbody detail - that the Branchline cars wou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00044.html (21,768 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: "harold huber" <sarge9@bresnan.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:59:58 -0700; Scott and all, I've found the Walters cars are a deeper color and that the Branchline lighter I prefer the Branchline they look closer to what I remember. When put together the Walthers looks new and; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00065.html (17,361 bytes)
12. RE: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <zephyr1@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 16:14:03 -0600; Aside from Rick's great note on the generalities of paint schemes for Pullmans on the Q, I don't know if anyone has answered this. The Diner is a NYC prototype, and the paired window coach is a B&O p; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00077.html (14,361 bytes)
13. RE: [CBQ] New Pullman Cars Comparison (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <zephyr1@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 18:21:52 -0600; There is a comparison on the PRR modeling site - which if you're not familiar with it, it is one of the best things out on the web and well worth your time and effort to look at even if you have no i; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-12/msg00079.html (11,460 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]