Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Heavyweight\s+Passenger\s+Cars\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Heavyweight\s+Passenger\s+Cars\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: dhelec@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 21:29:17 EDT; With the recent flurry of new heavyweights brought out by Walthers and Branchline it's tough for us marginal passenger train people to know what exactly would be correct and what isn't. How's about s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00092.html (10,061 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 10:02:58 -0500; While I'm not a pro, I can get you started... you are going to have to limit things as to period and use (in terms of your interest). As a first go-round, I would head for The Pullman Project Web Pag; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00097.html (12,404 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:46:21 EDT; Be aware that a lot of cars on the Q are Clover series Bob, The Q only had three 8-5 Clover cars. The most heavyweight sleepers the Q owned were 12-1 cars, but with several different plans (3410, 341; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00104.html (12,106 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: "Duncan Cameron" <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:05:27 -0400; Can anyone comment on the accuracy of the Walthers 36 seat diner for a Q car? I'd like something to bring up the rear of my early sixties Zephyr Rocket and am considering the various options for the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00105.html (14,030 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:14:19 -0500; The HW diner is a Southern design car. The Grill diner is a NYC car, the Streamlined diner is a ATSF car (but that's a 46 seat car), The new P-S 36 seat car is GN car (might be correct for Lake Michi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00106.html (11,666 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:00:26 -0500; Don't forget you can now get built up Branchline cars that are correct (in terms of lettering and most underbody equipment) from both Branchline and Intermountain. And while they will be more than Wa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00107.html (12,416 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 19:38:36 EDT; Don't forget you can now get built up Branchline cars that are correct (in terms of lettering and most underbody equipment) from both Branchline and Intermountain. And while they will be more than Wa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00108.html (10,786 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:57:52 -0500; I should have been more precise here - as I still didn't know era - it should have read " a lot of cars that were used were Clover series cars". If you look at the equipment consists in the Bulletin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00109.html (11,601 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 19:23:09 -0500; True - but again, I still don't know era - or trains or locale - so the Pullman Pool cars that are built up from Branchline and Intermountain could be useful. Bob Webber -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~-; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00110.html (11,642 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 20:57:07 -0500; BTW, if you do go looking at the CCR database or other records, remember that for the 12-1 you are looking for a plan 3410-3410a car. CB&Q had a LOT of 2410a and 2410f cars - which are more like the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00111.html (11,606 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 11:41:35 EDT; That's my question, what heavyweights under the Pullman pool would have shown up on the Burlingotn? I'm not 100% pleased with the way the Branchline RTR cars run. Although I'm working on a fix for th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00112.html (10,450 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 11:57:53 -0500; Loren, this data (Pullman Pool cars on the Burlington) would be in the assignment records that are at the Newberry library in Chicago. I keep planning a trip there and keep finding other things inter; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00127.html (14,686 bytes)
13. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 03:15:58 EDT; Bob and list, Ya know the Budd stainless steel Pullmans (sleeping) cars are much easier. Only 3 types of 10-6's, 1 type 6-5, 1 type 16 section, oh those flower 6-6-4's, and of course the Slumber Coac; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00132.html (10,325 bytes)
14. Re: [CBQ] Heavyweight Passenger Cars (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <no17@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 09:18:30 -0500; Oh yeah, and you actually KNOW which trains they were ordered for (for the most part) - a LOT easier! But what fun is that? I have to agree... I started an article on the HW Pullmans the D&RGW used t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-05/msg00134.html (11,053 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]