Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+0\-6\-0\s+No\.\s+3\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+0\-6\-0\s+No\.\s+3\?\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Yarger via groups.io" <bobyar2001=yahoo.com@groups.io>; Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:34:35 -0800; I think this must be another of the 0-6-0's. Ex-CB&Q? https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=5790905260935774&set=g.859677004090191 _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00011.html (10,352 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "HOL WAGNER" <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:17:35 +0000; Yes, that's ex-Q 509, Leo's favorite. Hol From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> on behalf of Bob Yarger via groups.io <bobyar2001=yahoo.com@groups.io> Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 6:34 PM To: CBQ@grou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00012.html (13,221 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "William Barber" <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 09:29:11 -0600; Bob, Yes, it is CB&Q 509, but it I believe that NWS&W has substituted a C&NW tender. Photos in the BRHS Flickr gallery of the locomotive in service on the Q do not show the reinforced coal bunker. Ra; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00013.html (10,219 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Louis Zadnichek via groups.io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 16:36:17 +0000 (UTC); March 5, 2021 Bob - I've attached an image of NWS&W No. 5 from the Chuck Zeiler Collection that shows an ex-C&NW USRA 0-6-0. Notice the reinforced coal bunker walls on the tender. The image was taken; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00014.html (20,607 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "HOL WAGNER" <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 18:52:19 +0000; This left side view of Q 505 as a 14th St. coachyard switcher in Chicago around 1940 clearly shows the many detail differences between the Q and C&NW USRA 0-6-0s and is evidence that NWS&W 5 in Louis; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00015.html (23,271 bytes)
6. [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Yarger via groups.io" <bobyar2001=yahoo.com@groups.io>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:55:00 -0800; Here is a puzzler. The CB&Q got ten USRA 0-6-0's from Cooke in 1919. All were listed as scrapped in 1954 except No. 504, listed as "sold for scrap 12-54". They were class G5, Nos. 500-509. This engin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00192.html (10,935 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "HOL WAGNER" <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:53:56 +0000; Bob: Yes, that's definitely the former Q 504, which worked for several years as NWS&W No. 3 at Sterling. Hol From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> on behalf of Bob Yarger via groups.io <bobyar2001=yaho; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00194.html (14,568 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "HOL WAGNER" <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:12:34 +0000; Bob and List: I was wrong in my previous statement. In checking my records I find that, although Corbin listed only one of the 10 G-5s and being sold for scrap, in fact all 10 were sold for scrap, no; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00198.html (17,008 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Leo Phillipp via groups.io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:34:03 -0600; Bob and List: I was wrong in my previous statement. In checking my records I find that, although Corbin listed only one of the 10 G-5s and being sold for scrap, in fact all 10 were sold for scrap, n; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00199.html (16,801 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Leo Phillipp via groups.io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:25:55 -0600; Bob and List: I was wrong in my previous statement. In checking my records I find that, although Corbin listed only one of the 10 G-5s and being sold for scrap, in fact all 10 were sold for scrap, n; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00200.html (16,189 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Scott Stearns" <scott_b_stearns@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:47:35 +0000; We also have a 509 in the Alley Job on our layout. Those working that job have a choice between the 509 and an SW. Most choose the 509. Scott & Nancy Stearns Zumbrota, MN On Feb 23, 2021, at 5:34 PM,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00201.html (19,872 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Louis Zadnichek via groups.io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:58:18 +0000 (UTC); February 23, 2021 Bob - Evidently, NWS&W purchased all 10 of the Class G-5 0-6-0's, but only put three back into service to switch the steel mill in Sterling, IL. The remaining seven were all scrappe; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00202.html (19,069 bytes)
13. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Louis Zadnichek via groups.io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:13:41 +0000 (UTC); February 23, 2021 Leo - All that I can tell you is that your beloved 509 left the roster in May 1954. Most likely, it was sold to Northwestern Steel & Wire in Sterling, IL. There is some possibility; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00203.html (18,516 bytes)
14. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Leo Phillipp via groups.io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:51:20 -0600; Louis, 509 sure look like she was getting plenty of attention at 14th street ! Leo On Feb 23, 2021, at 6:13 PM, Louis Zadnichek via groups.io <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io> wrote: February 23, 2021 L; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00204.html (18,620 bytes)
15. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "HOL WAGNER" <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 02:17:43 +0000; Unfortunately I have no info on who the G-5s were sold to except the three known to have gone to NWS&W. Hol Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device -- Original message -- From: "Louis Zadnichek via group; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00206.html (21,412 bytes)
16. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Louis Zadnichek via groups.io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:05:35 +0000 (UTC); February 24, 2021 Leo - Yes, a truly beautiful, spin-and-span clean 0-6-0 back in the day when depot (in this case Chicago Union Station) switchers were kept pristine to impress the public who rode t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00207.html (19,926 bytes)
17. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Hosler" <dehosler40@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:29:57 -0600; Louis: I would like to ask when back in the day was (when the Q kept G-5s in pristine condition in Chicago for station switching). I was a kid in the 40s (born 1940) and lived in Naperville and rode; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00209.html (22,825 bytes)
18. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "jpslhedgpeth via groups.io" <jpslhedgpeth=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:08:45 +0000 (UTC); I noticed while "perusing" the photo of 509 that she still had "poling pockets"...Probably didn't get much use around Chicago UD Pete February 23, 2021 Leo - All that I can tell you is that your belo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00211.html (19,595 bytes)
19. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "William Barber" <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:45:39 -0600; Louis, Leo and others, In the BRHS Flickr Gallery, we have photos of several Q G5 0-6-0s at or in service at Northwest Steel and Wire. It is possible that not only the original USRA G5s were sent the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00212.html (14,068 bytes)
20. Re: [CBQ] 0-6-0 No. 3? (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:11:16 -0600; All- On the subject of engines being sent to scrap. In my yout I spent a lot of time on my bike hanging around Congress Park station. One day I saw a line of CB&Q engines (mostly 2-8-2s as I recall; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00213.html (13,996 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]