Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Last\s+years\s+of\s+the\s+F\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Last\s+years\s+of\s+the\s+F\'s\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 21:13:55 -0500; Tom, If I can ever get my web site published again there are consists from '67 that show the F usage. Generally A's only with anything else in the middle. A F3A-U30B-F7A consist would be common. When; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00152.html (8,172 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@a...; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 23:15:37 EDT; Russ - One small correction here; F's as the leading unit account they had the lowest "short time rating". Used to bellyache about having an SD-9 lead an SD-45 consist but the "Cadillac" had the lowe; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00153.html (8,043 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: GORDON SMITH <kc2bw@a...>; Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 08:50:09 -0400; Didn't the lack of nose mu on the A units have somthing to do with this? (except for the couple that finally received it). I have seen pics of one or two A units trailing. And we used to put #6 and 2; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00154.html (8,912 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 09:48:31 -0500; Gordon, CB&Q GP7, GP9, SD7, & SD9 units, (but not C&S), were built with brake schedule 6BLQ. One of the thing that they did not have was an actuating hose MU capability. Many were straight piped thru; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00155.html (10,641 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: cttnghmrl@a...; Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 16:53:01 EDT; You may be a little early with your date. I have a shot of BN 784, an F9A, between two hood units taken 21 July 1980 at Little Falls, MN. Not enough of the hood units are visible to get their numbers; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00156.html (7,640 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 16:42:07 -0500; Ray, Thought the questions were about the last years of the CB&Q F units. BN 784 was Ex BN 9818, Exx NP 6704C, Nee NP 7011D a F9A. That unit was a 24-RL-MC-1 unit originally built for passenger servi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00157.html (9,181 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: GORDON SMITH <kc2bw@a...>; Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 19:55:26 -0400; Russ...What I meant about the nose MU capability was having an A unit in the middle of the consist which would naturally be impossible for all except the few that received the equiptment. In my air b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00158.html (12,135 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 21:01:37 -0500; Gordon, To the best of my knowledge all NP F9A's and most NP FT through F7 A's had nose MU. The GN fleet was also pretty well complete. The CB&Q avoided nose MU on F's and the only reason I can think; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00160.html (14,881 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@c...>; Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 00:14:58 -0700; Can someone explain what "short time ratings" are ? I don't know the term. Ken Martin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00164.html (8,116 bytes)
10. Re: [BRHSlist] Last years of the F's (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@i...>; Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:20:32 -0500; Ken, The traction motors on a diesel-electric motor can only get rid or a certain amount of heat. Beyond that point they will fail by either shorting or the literal melting of the windings. Presuming; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-04/msg00166.html (9,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]