Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Further\s+on\s+Flyer\'s\s+Flags\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Further\s+on\s+Flyer\'s\s+Flags\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:24:22 EDT; John Mitchell and any other listers who have followed up on my theory that the flags, subject of some speculation by the captioner, carried by The first eastbound No. 40 on June 12, 1939 and the seco; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-10/msg00055.html (10,823 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:58:16 -0700 (PDT); Pete CTC territory! However, the train did not originate or terminate in CTC territory. And rememer that "signals" could only be put up or taken down at REGISTER stations, so no, the flag is not moot; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-10/msg00057.html (12,491 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:32:30 -0500; Pete, Yes, I'd agree the flags or whatever are meaningless. CTC was installed from Akron to Denver in 1937. On the other hand it was still ABS from McCook to Akron where the train would normally run; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-10/msg00063.html (12,149 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:44:54 EDT; John Is this as much fun as arguing in court???? The train did indeed originate and terminate in CTC territory, therefore it needed only Clearance form A and any applicable slow orders. No. 40 origin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-10/msg00064.html (10,384 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:52:19 EDT; Russ: I just wrote my rebuttal to John's assertion before I read your recent note... I'm sure also that you would agree that operation between Denver and Akron required no signals because it's CTC, b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-10/msg00066.html (9,749 bytes)
6. Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 20:26:09 -0700 (PDT); Pete I don't know for sure, any more but as I recall,(at that time) the CTC did not go all the way into Denver (may have been Sand Creek). I think it ended some place, out in the sticks. I'll have wa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-10/msg00072.html (12,370 bytes)
7. Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags (score: 1): Author: "Steven Holding" <s.holding@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:24:00 -0500; Pete I Would have to say you are right the signal rules who goes first sjh -- Original Message -- From: <PSHedgpeth@aol.com> To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 6:44 PM Subj; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-10/msg00075.html (11,666 bytes)
8. Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags (score: 1): Author: "Steven Holding" <s.holding@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:32:36 -0500; Pete What are you putting on your shredded wheat. Those flags are white in both photos on page 40. I had to look it up as I haven't got that far sjh -- Original Message -- From: <PSHedgpeth@aol.com>; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-10/msg00076.html (12,304 bytes)
9. Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 14:59:52 EDT; John You have a good memory....The CTC ended at the west switch at Derby....however movements between Derby and Denver were by signal indication also...I don't have my TT..took it home last night con; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-10/msg00083.html (9,446 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]