BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Further on Flyer's Flags
From: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <136.25257971.2caf26e6@aol.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:BRHSlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com; contact BRHSlist-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Pete
CTC territory! However, the train did not originate or
terminate in CTC territory. And rememer that "signals"
could only be put up or taken down at REGISTER
stations, so no, the flag is not moot!
John
--- PSHedgpeth@aol.com wrote:
> John Mitchell and any other listers who have
> followed up on my theory that 
> the flags, subject of some speculation by the
> captioner, carried by The first 
> eastbound No. 40 on June 12, 1939 and the second
> eastbound No. 40 the next day 
> as shown on Page 40 BB No. 45.
> 
> Well, as I was "snarfing shredded wheat" for lunch
> today the answer came to 
> me.....Firming up my thought, that "even when I
> think I might be wrong I could 
> be right"...
> 
> Just before partaking of said lunch I consulted my
> 1929 Rule Book and agree 
> that daytime classification signals at that time
> required only flags by day and 
> both flags and white lights by night...
> 
> I dug through my old timetables, which is not an
> extensive file and found TT 
> No. 65 of the McCook Division effective April
> 28,1940...yes John it was a 
> Sunday.....I looked at pages 8 and 9 which cover the
> Akron to Denver Sub-division 
> eastward and westward.....
> 
> Suddenly it came to me that the matter of flags...or
> any other classification 
> signals was a moot point....The train could have
> been flying THE JOLLY ROGER 
> or OLD GLORY and it wouldn't have made any
> difference..The issue of the 
> schedule of No. 40 and/or 39 being in the TT is also
> moot.  Isn't that a lawyer term 
> John??
> 
> Before I reveal the answer, I'm going to allow any
> of you who are interested, 
> that's assuming that there are any who are..... to
> figure it out. The answer 
> is in the picture itself....examine it closely and
> you will see it.....not a 
> direct revelation, but it's there...I admit that I
> didn't see it myself until 
> after it dawned on me why the flag issue is moot,
> but this gave the 
> confirmation.
> 
> Here's some hints....Think:   1937.......DAWN TO
> DUSK.......US&S.
> 
> If you know your Q history you'll get it.
> 
> Pete
> 
> PS:  I still think that the flags are of a
> commorative nature with images of 
> each of the three roads displayed on the flags. 
> Probably carried on the first 
> few trips as part of the "ballyhoo" promoting the
> new service.
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> 
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/8ZCslB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>