Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com: 1145 ]

Total 1145 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [CBQ] Re: Dope Wagon (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:43:06 -0500
Archie You get at least 50% credit...The keely, as I understand it, was a water can equipped with a hook so that it could be hung over a grab iron or any other protruding item on a car with a hose wh
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00072.html (17,526 bytes)

242. Re: [CBQ] Waycar Book (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:44:22 -0500
It ain't new a new can, but it's a forbidden subject on this list....The web police will get you if you continue. Pete All, About two years ago (?) I remember some talk about a CB&Q WayCar book. Did
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00073.html (10,731 bytes)

243. Re: [CBQ] Re: Dope Wagon (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:31:42 -0500
I did a little checking in my TREASURY OF RR FOLKLORE but couldn't find any reference there...In a 1966 piece in Railroad Magazine by the late Bill Knapke in a list of definitions he says...."Keeley
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00079.html (20,698 bytes)

244. Re: [CBQ] Re: Dope Wagon (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:39:03 -0500
Keeley Cure...GOOGLE Keeley Cure and you'll find out all you would ever want to know about the matter. It did, indeed, begin in Dwight, IL and there is a museum and other "mementoes" of the Keeley In
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00080.html (21,572 bytes)

245. Re: [CBQ] Re: Dope Wagon (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:34:42 -0500
John Didn't you read my post yesterday...I covered the subject...being an ex box packer I am qualified. I also asked if anyone knew what a Keeley was..how about you?? Pete For all of you younger guys
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00088.html (13,738 bytes)

246. [CBQ] Re: [BRHSlist] Naperville crash (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:09:05 -0400
Bob Campbell is confused re my posting re Naperville.....I belong to both CB&Q and BRHS groups and often pay little or no attention to the source of requests for information nor responses thereto hen
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00132.html (13,587 bytes)

247. Re: [CBQ] Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:00:06 -0400
Just for some specifics to add to Gerald's general comments re mixed trains. During the 1950's my railfan buddy Jim Christen and I would take summer trips primarily riding branch line mixed trains...
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00145.html (13,216 bytes)

248. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q in NE Kansas??? (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:20:16 -0400
That's the Atchson and NEbraska....Parts of it are still "seeable" and a couple of depots are still extant..White Cloud and another IIRC. The NRHS Topeka Chapter ran a "driving tour" over this route
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00183.html (11,023 bytes)

249. Re: [CBQ] 61 Hann...................... (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:46:14 -0400
Leo et al This packing house stuff which you have eloquently described was known in the "trade" as PHP...Packing House Products...and was often designated as such as a commodity grouping Pete Jeff, I
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00213.html (11,636 bytes)

250. Re: [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q....combination cars (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:27:05 -0400
Charlie et al At the risk of being confirmed as?certificably unknowledgable I'll risk a tentatative contradiction to your assertion that the Q never puchased combine cars specifically for branchline
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00249.html (23,097 bytes)

251. [CBQ] Hol Wagner (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:02:50 -0400
Hol Please contact me off list...Thanks Pete Hedgpeth jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00275.html (9,521 bytes)

252. Re: [CBQ] 1958 Wreck (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:44:40 -0500
Colorado and Southern...Broomfield, CO....9/22/58 Go to the ICC website for particulars Pete irst, my apologies, this should have gone to this group, not the BRHS list. he photos are in the CBQ Yahoo
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00007.html (11,740 bytes)

253. Re: [CBQ] 1958 Wreck (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:11:14 -0500
Yes,,,Train No. 30 Eng 9936B and Extra 700D north with 700C, 112B and 119A Pete Is this the wreck at Broomfield CO on 22 Sep 1958 with F7A CS 700D? Norm Metcalf, Boulder Colorado [Non-text portions o
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00011.html (11,313 bytes)

254. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:56:06 -0500
Have you guys gone to the ICC website and read the details????  If you haven't you need to do so... Something which I refer to as the "intimidation factor" was involved here...If you want me to I'll
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00014.html (15,810 bytes)

255. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:08:07 -0500
Both affairs are listed right next to each other on the ICC website...You can read the details of both. BTW someone referred to the "Goin Railroadin" book and the 'Speas boys as engineers.... If any
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00016.html (10,483 bytes)

256. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:34:57 -0500
Here's the link to the ICC website...http://dotlibrary.specialcollection.net/ Click on the Rairoad Accident investigations 1911-1994....This will bring up the individual years....Click on 1958...Ther
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00026.html (18,077 bytes)

257. Re:: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck and the intimidation factor (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:55:45 -0500
A couple of days ago I mentioned that after sufficient time had elapsed for all who wanted to participate in the discussion of the 1958 wrecks at Chugwater and Bloomfield to have read or reread the I
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00046.html (19,976 bytes)

258. Re: [CBQ] Intimidation Factor (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:58:57 -0500
Probably another "frank" ... mostly one sided discussion. I'll write more in the morning...Thanks for your support Leo.... Pete The intimidation factor also worked as a positive force for learning an
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00063.html (13,906 bytes)

259. Re: [CBQ] Intimidation Factor (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:43:36 -0500
Leo I neglected to say in my note re your reading the orders.......? You may have come close to committing the "unpardonable sin"...I was never guilty of such egregious behaviour..... That sort of "t
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00072.html (15,558 bytes)

260. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 C&S Wreck (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:20:01 -0500
SEv eral if memory serves...Check the ICC report it gives the exact number Pete Were any passengers hurt on #30? sjl [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this m
/archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00082.html (11,623 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu