BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Re: Abbreviation quiz

To: "CBQ@yahoogroups.com" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Abbreviation quiz
From: William Jackson <macon249@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 22:02:18 -0500
Cc: "CBQ@yahoogroups.com" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1357441342; bh=zDutjwqjRYkQ/BYaVuR0IMOh+GLv85i1q0nRV94TO4M=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Received:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Cc:X-Mailer:To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=1VsMq3hPtcb4tRQDz+kPuTdVHRgtm7k6LwF4PDrTOt/I841olfCtBREyo78ic51fyuAgMQFjg9bAgYM0YFM74yBNh+7x+r6DseLV5/cxUWs9UeJN2KZfI6chCtY5jhD9B4b0541KZfBBsTCrKNbrxnfJx/KdMO+WIOffr8+aswM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=OA5v7BrRjjknNFpyAFsK7DjPuEV0pAh6p0V0RnAVWCbh+feGS0z8lq7hfckseajJgZFz1CA6mBCaRsRftb+rrZVYt4AOjEeZdPHczxW+fhbgJPNwT+Pvl5Pno/Dnl+YfL9MSm+UugXCQgezgtY60I6GKY2Vi655KXKsi+mfI9aE=;
In-reply-to: <kca9e6+g69u@eGroups.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <kca9e6+g69u@eGroups.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


Let me see now Mike, I think they used to call us "Atari Engineers". That was the hardest, test I ever had. I had Jim Hill, as the instructor, or else I would have never made it. I am thinking I signed your card once. Talk about the Cat, having mercy on the Mouse. You guys, helped the mouse, many times. 
William Jackson

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 5, 2013, at 5:28 PM, "mdeckergwtcnet" <mdecker@gwtc.net> wrote:

 



--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, Jpslhedgpeth@... wrote:
>
>
> Just as I thought Mike. RE: carlengths...Used to be you figured about a "rail length" plus a lttle for a C/L...in days of mostly 40 ft cars. Now I guess everything almost is well above that number.
>
>
>
> Pete
>

Ya, Pete.

When I hired out we had a pole line. There were 40 poles to the mile, and I figured 2-1/2 cars to the pole. Everybody else was taught that when they hired out, so even with new guys, the car counts were pretty close. Of course, if the Conductor or Brakeman didn't like the Engineer, those last five or ten cars could go by pretty fast :>)

Now, you've got nothin'. The guys on the ground have to guess, and the seats on the new motors are lots farther off the ground, and you can't see the track right in front of the motors, so you don't have the same reference point as on the SD's and Geeps.

I used to be pretty good at judging my speed by the poles. One time, Trainmaster Turner was riding home with me, after the Company had run them all through a modified Engineer school so they could run if we were on strike. I had a bad order speed recorder on the lead motor and I'd had plenty of practice "counting seconds" on the poles. Bruce was riding the second motor, and when he came up at Edgemont he told me that I ran closer to speed without a speed recoreder than he could with one :>)

Mike



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>