To: | <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Rule 108 |
From: | "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:56:17 +1300 |
Delivered-to: | archives@venus.nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1296194201; bh=DTSJPR6/9ObdX6LLiMI/s1tqKqvpOCM+4zUQ/OTkFBE=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:X-IronPort-AV:X-Received:Message-ID:To:References:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:x-mimeole:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hQVrkpAbRYz/LDiyUYARRA8V0Bc3tMOIKQRQ/dFwhAXFeO2CDgzUXK1GqrCIkwkM4egr5xrFs2ozWxF3VRu6U89DBSIc0FwxwM5vcUZzNIHDjN+17jsvKnHWuZHc/tWl |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=HtC8dqkJyVv1lr5cedNGaZ1himAT84amJmrbNlcZNileOqdPS569WFaWTd4eDDiANvjJtirNTAmSzBSGqUhoIg+41m8syykscjKi4r/y9pyE6qygD91lMfkvjd1HIDwP; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <62110.5b5064ed.3a723aa4@aol.com> <483534.474.qm@web82403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <8CD8C521C1F535E-1CE0-7360@webmail-m046.sysops.aol.com> <CB8E65739DD94EFC84046C57FB457807@STUDY> <8CD8CB80C5A2F68-1D18-59A8@Webmail-d116.sysops.aol.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Pete Thanks for the explanation. Hard to argue with! Were there any specific rules about movement in fog or was Rule 108 relied on to cover it? Rupert ----- Original Message ----- From: <Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com> To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [CBQ] Rule 108 > > Rupert et al...Rule 108 IS a summary.....Burlington Lines RULES OF THE > OPERATING DEPARTMENT effective December 1, 1929... > > MOVEMENT OF TRAINS: 108 In case of doubt or uncertainty the safe course > must be taken. That's it. > > The rule is one of those that has always been and still is...it was the same > on all railroads. > > My grandfather always said of the Rock Port Langdon and Northern..."We only > have one rule"....Proceed as the way is seen and known > to be clear" > > Pete > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Rule 108, Jpslhedgpeth |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Baldwin VO-1000 (cont), John Manion |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Rule 108, Jpslhedgpeth |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Rule 108, Jpslhedgpeth |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |