BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Re: New Q steam

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: New Q steam
From: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:45:20 -0600
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=FoodmJz8z7t8rBGYfYTVJh5fr5r9BEc29YLQIQW5/udsTdycerJ/4ofP82uA/mDzfmC+pHQ563ZI1j3oRNqUEwGqbBqjylCwp5QVI0AOFIVlJ11IWV7srTnnCd3gN7lt;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060201165318.03d3aa38@mail.comcast.net> <drrfv5+pmnj@eGroups.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20060201204405.03732eb0@mail.comcast.net> <016d01c62821$be85cf30$6401a8c0@DELL02> <6.2.3.4.2.20060202133617.03783560@mail.comcast.net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Even if you were to do a 2-8-2 for the Q - and wanted
 to branch out for the Grand Canyon RR, there would be enough changes
> to some parts that it may not be worth it, though they are or were
> the same locomotive.

The Grand Canyon rebuild would have to be included foi the reasons you 
mention.  I will not make comments about its appearance.... at least they 
kept the number!
If I were calling the shots, the tender would have to be set up for 
straight, sloped sides and oil bunker (I disremember right now if O1a s were 
set up for oil....but you get my drift)  And, I would like to see Elesco 
version(s) as well.  I don't know if you can get an O1 out of an O1a but 
that would have to be "thunk through".

> It's like narrow gauge as well -

The narrow gauge  ready-to-run market (at least outside of On30 which is 
more of an inside Garden Railway crowd) is an unknown.  So far two companies 
are jumping in
into HOn3  search of the pot of gold at the end of rainbows caused by dark 
clouds..... it remains to be seen if there are legions of people waiting for 
an easy way to
get into narrow gauge or if the people in narrow gauge are there because 
they get to build everything.  Without widely available RTR track we may not 
find out.....
As far as the CB&Q 2-8-0, Bachmann went the other way with their G Gauge 
outside frame 2-8-0 and sort of did the catalog engine.  I, too, have have a 
soft spot for the 537 and 538 but am not sure how it would sell vs. the C-16 
etc. in On30 or HOn3...or Nn3!.

(some models)....
> command ridiculous prices compared to a

One has to be carefull making decisions based on eBay prices.   It only 
takes a couple of fools or a small, dedicated group of modelers to drive up 
the price of an
offbeat model.  They already have their's and the production run has to go 
in search of other people dying for such a locomotive that might not exist.

Charlie Vlk 



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>