BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] New Q steam

To: "BRHS LIST" <cbq@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [CBQ] New Q steam
From: "John Trulson" <norskeviking@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:35:24 -0800
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=A/B9SWH/L3HNOaEOg5WG4AVl/m2oNXfRLnw/oS0w8wf6ycwcaGWpHdfqlPE/vO1y14SmBBMmaWln1oFP3rpINZxt5tXCLRj1Q0itYLhpWq9RdwfUEZZM6viWdMP164yj;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Seal-send-time: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:35:24 -0800
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
With all the new steam locomotives coming out in plastic, cheaper brass or cast 
metal/plastic, why is it most are larger locomotives? I know we have a K-2 
4-6-0, but why not a K-4 (#919), P-6,P-6A 4-4-2, R-5A 2-6-2 or better yet an 
S-2A with or without a feedwater and/or a S-3 ?  We seem to have or had more 
models of 2-8-2's and 4-8-4's than we really need. I would think there are more 
modelers out there that could use smaller loco's on their layouts than most of 
the big stuff. Someone gave me a penny for my thoughts and this is it. John.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>