Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+WAY\s+CAR\s+TRUCKS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+WAY\s+CAR\s+TRUCKS\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: "sellarsmark_aus" <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:54:22 -0600; Greetings. What trucks did the CB&Q use under the NE-1 to NE-9 way cars in the early 1950s? The C&S way cars appear to have kept their original arch bar trucks till scrapped. Is this correct? The CB&; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00182.html (9,388 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: "Bob Yarger" <ryarger@rypn.org>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 07:52:37 -0500; I believe some C&S cabooses kept the archbars, but others had cast trucks, as seen here: http://www.crrm.org/train_pics/caboose.htm I recall that a few wood cabooses were rebuilt with electric lights; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00183.html (10,663 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:11:20 -0800; I have seen a few photos of C&S waycars with archbars, but many more with cast trucks. Moreover, keep in mind that the C&S was an early adopter of cast trucks. Even its narrow gauge freight cars were; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00184.html (9,647 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:31:42 -0800; PS: I should have checked The Colorado Road before hitting "send." Wagner's roster lists that car (10606) as having been built in 1944 by the C&S itself. I still wonder about the provenance of the tr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00185.html (9,632 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:56:08 -0800 (PST); Greetings Bob, I suspect that the 10576-10587 and the 10588-10593 series way cars were built with and largely kept their arch bar trucks as they were not required for interchange (and therefore could; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00197.html (12,906 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:07:00 -0800 (PST); Greetings Jonatahn, I have revisited Hol Wagners book frequently of late BUT... I had overlooked the 10594-612 series. I had also forgotten the picture of 10606 at the CRRM. As it was built in 1944 i; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00198.html (11,246 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:39:39 -0600; Seems to me the C&S / FW&D cars commonly carried a form of T-section cast trucks.... and of course, all wood "waycars" on the Q had No.7 Wood Beam trucks.....except for the one sidedoor car that got; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00202.html (9,669 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:33:55 -0800 (PST); Greetings Charlie, Thank you for your comments. Hol Wagner's "Colorado Road" p 343 shows C&S way car 10578 in Dec 1968 with what appears to be truck bolster constructed of rolled rather than steel. Y; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00246.html (11,313 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:33:27 -0600; As a further observation I have since found some C&S caboose pictures and they have a Andrews-pattern (although "flatter" than the common kind) on them. The standard No.7 truck was a CB&Q design. I a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00253.html (10,565 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:04:24 -0800 (PST); Greetings Charlie I am most grateful for your insights. Being new to this, I may have mistaken the Andrews pattern trucks for Arch bar trucks on the C&S way cars built in the mid 1920s. The longevity; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00255.html (12,348 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:00:25 -0600; I don't know about the pool train waycar assignments but know that a few Q waycars did get sold to the FW&D, possibly the C&S as well....I'd have to check The Colorado Road to refresh my memory. Char; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00258.html (9,679 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:14:47 -0600; Hol Wagner replied to my speculation with the facts... while the FW&D replaced cabooses in worse condition with various Q four window waycars, the C&S never got any cars from the Q. The FW&D also pur; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00261.html (10,061 bytes)
13. Re: [CBQ] WAY CAR TRUCKS (score: 1): Author: Mark Sellars <sellarsmark_aus@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:26:21 -0800 (PST); Greetings Charlie, Many thanks for the answer on the "non-pooling" of the Q/ C&S/ FW&D way cars. I guess the labour unions would have been none too keen on a way car pooling concept. Any idea on the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00268.html (11,326 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]