Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Triple\s+track\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Triple\s+track\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Triple Track (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:06:13 +1200; On the Burlington third or middle track is, from 4 a.m. to 4 p.m., normally an eastbound track: and from 4 p.m. to 4 a.m. westbound. An eastbound conductor desiring to use the this track at, say 3.30; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-04/msg00166.html (10,340 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Triple track (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:58:46 +1300; Can someone advise me as to when the third track was added to the west Chicago tracks? (I feel that I should know this but can't find the reference!) Thanks Rupert Gamlen Auckland [Non-text portions; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00097.html (10,782 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Triple track (score: 1): Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:16:47 -0600; Rupert I dug around and found paper copies of the track alighnment diagrams. I assume you are talking about the Chicago-Aurora mainlines as the West Chicago branch wasn't even double tracked..... The; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00131.html (12,970 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Triple track (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:27:27 -0500; Charlie, Wasn't the alleged "fourth track" around Berwyn or LaGrange? I seem to remember that rather than Aurora - Downers Grove? I'm just curious - no dog in this fight! Rich G. Rupert I dug around; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00132.html (13,793 bytes)
5. [CBQ] Triple track (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:34:12 -0500 (EST); Rich, 4th main that I am familiar with was Eola to Downers Grove. It is referenced in Overtons book. Also see the article in Zephyr 59 on "An Evening at Downers Grove" where I make a reference to it.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00133.html (11,550 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Triple track (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:39:12 -0600; No, it was actually Downers Grove-Eola. This question came up a couple years back and I authoritatively "pooh-poohed" the idea, only to be gently and firmly set straight by members who knew better an; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00134.html (12,524 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Triple track (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:41:57 -0500; Leo, OK, I certainly believe that. I do remember, a long time ago, we discussed a fourth line some where closer to Berwyn or LaGrange?! Maybe it was just planned and never came about. I should search; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00135.html (12,637 bytes)
8. [CBQ] Triple Track (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:51:12 -0500 (EST); Rich, One thing is sure.Between the IC at Berwyn and the DesPlaines River there would have been plenty of room for another track on either side of the triple track. In several spots there were spurs; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00136.html (11,655 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Triple Track (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:17:49 -0500; Leo, You know, maybe I'm confusing this with a planned project to elevate the Q track at LaGrange. I do need to look at the archives! Rich G. Rich, One thing is sure.Between the IC at Berwyn and the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00137.html (12,710 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Triple track (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:35:15 -0800 (PST); Then there was the elevation from Union Ave to Cicero in about the same time as the elevation at Aurora. Once this was done there was a plan and a very nice book put out on the elevation from Cicero; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00143.html (14,516 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] Triple track (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:54:59 +1300; Charlie Thanks for digging out this information - I'm particularly interested in the Hinsdale to La Grange area so I'll take 1872 for the third track unless anyone can substantiate an alternative dat; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00144.html (13,786 bytes)
12. Fw: [CBQ] Triple track (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:22:12 +1300; Sorry, getting myself confused - should be 1887 -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Tradit; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00146.html (11,533 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]