Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Mystery\s+Box\s+on\s+Q\s+GP9\s+\#274\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Mystery Box on Q GP9 #274 (score: 1)
Author: "graywolfs2" <graywolfs02@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 10:27:24 -0600
Hi Gang, Could it possibly be the box for the control of the cab signaling system the "Q" used in the Chicago-Aurora raceway? The Northerns (5632 etc) had them too...see: http://transport.castlegraph
/archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00082.html (11,898 bytes)

2. [CBQ] Re: Mystery Box on Q GP9 #274 (score: 1)
Author: "rgs20460" <amtrak347@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 13:24:03 -0600
Dave & Greg - The "Mystery Box" is definitely the Automatic Cab Signal box (disconnected by the time of the photo in 1969; no ACS induction bar behind end plate and below the steps). Due to the short
/archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00099.html (12,485 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Mystery Box on Q GP9 #274 (score: 1)
Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 20:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Wait a minute Why would a Lines West engine have the cab signals. It is not listed as having Cab Signals and was always assigned to Lincoln per the reprinted assignment sheets the society has done. I
/archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00101.html (13,122 bytes)

4. [CBQ] Re: Mystery Box on Q GP9 #274 (score: 1)
Author: "therrboomer" <therrboomer@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:16:45 -0600
Could this unit have UP cab signal installed? Dick ** -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email |
/archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00111.html (14,068 bytes)

5. [CBQ] Re: Mystery Box on Q GP9 #274 (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:25:14 -0500
Steve, While the GP-9s were generally assigned to Lines West, they did operated east to Chicago and probably other terminals. They only had to be "home" for major inspections. The 30 day inspection c
/archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00117.html (11,831 bytes)

6. [CBQ] Re: Mystery Box on Q GP9 #274 (score: 1)
Author: "rgs20460" <amtrak347@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:55:16 -0600
Wait a week. What would locomotive Assignment (for maintenance) have to do with locomotive usage? Just because a unit is assigned Lines West (for maintenance) doesn't mean it couldn't travel all over
/archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00143.html (14,670 bytes)

7. RE: [CBQ] Re: Mystery Box on Q GP9 #274 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:38:46 -0400
Hi all, To sum up the correspondence so far, the consensus is that the box shown on GP9 # 274 is a cab signal equipment box. Hol & I have been corresponding and the fact that he has brought up is tha
/archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00166.html (13,007 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] Re: Mystery Box on Q GP9 #274 (score: 1)
Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
On top of this there are three different styles of boxes. GP 7's 243 and 244 are shown in assignment sheets to have cab signals. And they have the oblong boxes like 4960 and 5632(Al Holck Vol. 2) GP
/archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00167.html (14,023 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu